I exposed maskuma's sheer ignorance so now his only resort is to post idiotic pictures. He has nothing intelligent to say on this thread.
Look men you can post more ujinga posters. But the fact remains that your statement below is completely bogus:
masukuma wrote:. A crime needs an accuser.
Especially in cases of domestic abuse, a person can be convicted even when there is no accuser. The reason is that the battered person is typically afraid of pressing charges.
Here is an example of a man who was conviected of batterry even though his wife refused to testifyThis applies to Koffi's dancer. She must be afraid of Koffi and she must have been coerced by Koffi to claim she was not attacked. Thats why she defended Koffi. But the fact that she is afriad to testify against Koffi should not stop the authorities from pursuing crimonal charges.
This is not just about Pamela. It is also about the other women that Koffi has abused and will abuse in the future if he is not punished.
Now rather than post childish pictures, how about showing wazuans that you have an ounce of intelligence and tell us why you statement is still correct.