This article is a classic defense move by the director(s).
The issue is simple, did the bank advance 7.9Bn,
Ans; yes
To whom?
What is so difficult with the director saying in this article (or to the CID) that these loans were advanced to person ABC who are not associated with the bank, therefore the insider classification is wrong!!
Ama!!
Trying to explain this whole mess as some Islamic banking treatment is BS. Infact I would be curious to know whose names are on the mentioned properties
The BD articles today read like paid adverts by the Directors, attempting to claw back lost ground.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins