In the case of different behavior for different individuals or when one individual behaves differently along a timeline we have a philosophy of mind enabled with the task of finding, testing and using objective values. For example in the philosophy of mind I'm using I can enumerate the following objective values ( allow me to qualify 'objective' to entail the acquisition of information that's uninfluenced by personal opinion to the extent of non arbitrary rejection of contrary evidence as availed by behavior);

1. The presence of a mind(s)

2. Mind contents like objects, relations, qualia, processes

3. Mind structures and models including energy and information dynamics

4. Behavior and behavior patterns and communication dynamics

Any conclusion I make is per force, an assertion of my experience and evaluation of a conclusion is done by it's results and the structure of these results with respect to my experience. Like in the case of affairs I'd evaluate my conclusions by checking for:

1. Efficacy and effectiveness- is my propensity for affairs lower? Have I reduced my affairs?

2. Efficiency- how much time is required to adapt? How much intelligence is required? What's the ease of acquiring intelligence.

3. Morality and ethics- how much does it conform to the reality of other minds?

Because this is a highly dynamic process and rationality is bounded, I dare not speak of 'flawlessness'. Intelligence is worked on at every moment. For example, the number of objects and possible relations is infinite, add the characteristic of 'information hiding' in a mind system and flaws appear all over. I look at flaws as indicative of uncertainty and chaos- space for infinite possibility.

I feel lost.

Where are you going?

Whirling is moving. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sufi_whirling