Cde Monomotapa wrote:hisah wrote:[quote=sparkly]Why Why Why then is Kengen doing a rights issue?
KQ did this back in 2012. We know how that script panned out to date! KGN ultimately intends to balance its Debt/Equity ratio. The mode is what's up for debate.
The Rights when successful will need earnings to match or exceed the expanded shares. Do the new geo & wind plants suffice? If not EPS will be greatly compromised.
The PPP eases pressure on KGN's balance sheet from taking on too much debt and it can use retained earnings to buff up equity.
As for KQ to finance the new fleet, on paper, intended the following; The Afreximbank (debt-PDP) package, Cash (Rights) & internal funds. Of course that had mixed results operations wise & delivery timing.
Industry practice it seems, from Boeing:
Quote:Boeing projects that export credit will represent 13% of funding for its 2015 deliveries, compared with capital markets at 33%, bank debt at 29% and cash at 25%. Lessors with material order books with Boeing include Air Lease Corp. (206 Boeing planes on order as of March 2015), GE Capital Aviation Services (149 Boeing planes on order as of May 2015...
https://www.fitchratings.../pressrelease?id=987478[/quote]
Boeing's goal is to sell planes. KQ stretched itself [over-legeraged] and left little room for error or market disruption. Then came the perfect storm & K was clobbered.
KK did something similar but it managed to pull out with cost-cutting and that it wasn't as leveraged as KQ.
Leverage does goose returns (RoE) but has to be used judiciously e.g. Centum [though I worry about them as well] which has divested some assets [UAP, sale of parts of Two Rivers] to manage debt levels.
KQ's directors were only looking at the upside because they had no skin in the game. The losses do not affect them yet the gains would gain them accolades & perks.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett