masukuma wrote:
'Management reserves the right of admission' yes - but not based on a single variable i.e. skin color or gender e.t.c. and especially not those variables that one cannot change on their own.
On voting it's your choice! objectivity is all relative to people depending on your goggles. Who told you that we are actually supposed to vote 'objectively'? why are you forcing people to vote 'objectively'? voting is a voice! it's expression! kwanza who told you people vote based on 'negative ethnicity'? did you ask them? or uliona results uka jaza pengo at results ni 'negative ethnicity'?
voting is not discrimination nor are you supposed to treat everyone equally on a ballot! voting is choice informed by what you privately think is important. you cannot claim discrimination because people did not choose you! you can claim discrimination when public places admit others and not you based on one or two variables that you cannot change.
if googles are involved, then that is not objectivity..(c & p objectivity - of a person or their judgment-not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts..). Objectivity and subjectivity are mutually exclusive..
So central/Rift voted 90% Uhuruto and Nyanza/Wstn voted 85% CORD not because of negative ethnicity but things that people cannot change on their own ..? That is very very interesting..
Seems I should agree that these are private decisions,and we have no way of changing them..
Probably I need to accept and move on..
Your statement:
you can claim discrimination when public places admit others and not you based on one or two variables that you cannot changeThe office of the President is a public office - and someone is allowed(read voted in) or not based mostly on their
tribe, which unfortunately they cant change..
"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence." ― Charles Bukowski