kiash wrote: I also noted that in nation, so many articles do not receive comments like before unlike the star's articles where you will find at leat 30 comments or more. Assuming 1 in every 20 readers leave a comment, then they might have a good number of readers.They reloaded their new version some few days ago. Could they overthrow the leaders??
My take on this is that on The Star, comments appear immediately so discussions are easier while Nation and Standard police the comments sections.
Star articles are also a bit better in terms of content and grammar compared to the other two - especially Standard which make me want to pull out my hair. I don't buy the argument that articles in the physical paper should be better ... high standards should be maintained on both (maybe newbies practice online before being published on the physical paper???)