Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Cannibalism
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Othelo wrote:tycho wrote:Othelo wrote:The thought bof sipping a cup of human blood just like busaa looks ........... ops fascinating!!!
Can i join you!!! What exactly is fascinating about drinking human blood? there is a feel of power over nature if you did it intentionally, weka pilipili, ongeza chumvi and the likes. However i have tasted.... not drank human blood before! Hahaha! You're probably right. The very idea has made me tremble. There's some fear, but there's something else; joy. Earnest desire.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept? Muriel, if you go back to the beginning of our conversation today you'll find I am waiting for your answer on this matter. My problem is, this idea needs some focusing and clarification.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept? Muriel, if you go back to the beginning of our conversation today you'll find I am waiting for your answer on this matter. My problem is, this idea needs some focusing and clarification. My answer is the question 'why should I accept?' Indeed, I also need clarification.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
That will distract us from the case at hand. We are looking at this case of having this idea that 'you will know you have made it if you eat human flesh, and drink human blood with sangfroid'. You have human flesh and human blood but you have not eaten and drunk. Why?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
That will distract us from the case at hand. We are looking at this case of having this idea that 'you will know you have made it if you eat human flesh, and drink human blood with sangfroid'. You have human flesh and human blood but you have not eaten and drunk. Why? To be more precise, because you have not eaten or drunk, 1. where did the idea fizzle to or 2. did you not have sangfroid?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
That will distract us from the case at hand. We are looking at this case of having this idea that 'you will know you have made it if you eat human flesh, and drink human blood with sangfroid'. You have human flesh and human blood but you have not eaten and drunk. Why? I don't know.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
That will distract us from the case at hand. We are looking at this case of having this idea that 'you will know you have made it if you eat human flesh, and drink human blood with sangfroid'. You have human flesh and human blood but you have not eaten and drunk. Why? To be more precise, because you have not eaten or drunk, 1. where did the idea fizzle to or 2. did you not have sangfroid? Am not aware of any 'fizzling'. But would be delighted to see how it 'fizzled'. If at all I've had such a notion.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/16/2007 Posts: 1,320
|
tycho wrote:Mtu Biz wrote:How long have you had this idea ? The idea isn't older than a week. Do you know what gave rise to this idea ?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,330 Location: Masada
|
Tycho-Muriel Axis of Evil! Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:At least we know that there's an instance in which a man ate himself, and offered himself to be eaten, and was in fact eaten.
Maybe looking at this case would give us light.
That will distract us from the case at hand. We are looking at this case of having this idea that 'you will know you have made it if you eat human flesh, and drink human blood with sangfroid'. You have human flesh and human blood but you have not eaten and drunk. Why? To be more precise, because you have not eaten or drunk, 1. where did the idea fizzle to or 2. did you not have sangfroid? Am not aware of any 'fizzling'. But would be delighted to see how it 'fizzled'. If at all I've had such a notion. Then you did not have peace, tranquility, composure. You did not have sangfroid. Why do you want to do something that causes discomfort to you? The other day you said 'ease' was one of your key considerations.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Mtu Biz wrote:tycho wrote:Mtu Biz wrote:How long have you had this idea ? The idea isn't older than a week. Do you know what gave rise to this idea ? Yes. A psychiatric analysis of myself, and consequent events.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Impunity wrote:Tycho-Muriel Axis of Evil! No am not!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Cannibalism
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|