Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Cannibalism
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Othelo wrote:tycho wrote:Othelo wrote:The thought bof sipping a cup of human blood just like busaa looks ........... ops fascinating!!!
Can i join you!!! What exactly is fascinating about drinking human blood? there is a feel of power over nature if you did it intentionally, weka pilipili, ongeza chumvi and the likes. However i have tasted.... not drank human blood before! Hahaha! You're probably right. The very idea has made me tremble. There's some fear, but there's something else; joy. Earnest desire.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept? Muriel, if you go back to the beginning of our conversation today you'll find I am waiting for your answer on this matter. My problem is, this idea needs some focusing and clarification.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:
Brother, I am wondering about you.
I am wondering why you are wondering yet you have not drank your own blood and eaten your own flesh.
Surely that should have been a given, no?
Really? What makes it a 'given'? Why? Access for starters. Yes. Access. But is that sufficient reason for me? Or in what circumstances would access be the only, and sufficient condition? Yes. For 'starters' as used in the sentence: 1. used to say that something is the first in a list of things: 2. just as a beginning 3. The first in a series, especially the first course of a meal; an appetizer. Why should not cupping your own blood and partaking of your own flesh for starters not be a given? I see. To me, nothing is a 'given'. So you have not drank your own blood or eaten your own flesh but you want mine? Why should I accept? Muriel, if you go back to the beginning of our conversation today you'll find I am waiting for your answer on this matter. My problem is, this idea needs some focusing and clarification. My answer is the question 'why should I accept?' Indeed, I also need clarification.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Cannibalism
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|