wazua Sun, May 3, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

2 Pages<12
Can HIV control LEUKEMIA?
BGL
#11 Posted : Monday, February 08, 2010 6:23:34 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
@Sellah
All the HAART drugs target a protein of the virus. Proteins are expressed on active cells. Resting cells are the fraction that harbours the intergrated provirus, in their inactive site they are "out of the radar". Currently i am working on cloning the cytoplasmic domain of the envelope that is responsible for retrograde transport from the cell surface to the trans golgi network that making the HIV - virus a master of disguise......... hiding itself from the immune surveillance of the body.
History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
Intelligentsia
#12 Posted : Monday, February 08, 2010 6:57:01 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/1/2009
Posts: 2,436
Very interersting discussion @ Selah you have brought up, and more dope given by BGL.

@ BGL, I have always wondered something: If a mosquito feeds on the blood of a sero-positive person, and proceeds to later bite a HIV-ve person, the negative person does NOT contract HIV, otherwise a good no. of us would be positive!

Ergo, it follows that something happens to the blood of the HIV+ person in the mosquito's digestive tract that makes it lose its ability to infect the negative person, its ability to attach to the CD4 cells of the negative subject. What is this? Is it a chemical - is it in the mosquito's salive, digestive enzymes? Or? Because am thinking (the layman that I am,remember) that if we can isolate this chemical them we could be staring at the cure or vaccine of HIV. Is there a flaw, a lacunae in this line of thinking? What say you?

BGL
#13 Posted : Monday, February 08, 2010 12:49:05 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
@ Intelligentsia…. Viruses including HIV survive in hosts, some hosts are compatible while others are not. In that case mosquitoes are not compatible hosts for HIV... period. But a point of information which may be useful. Worldwide infection rate with HIV-1 is estimated at 14,000 per day but millions are exposed to the virus and this may be explained by thousands of discordant couples where the virus has a chance to infect but it does not. Transmission probability per exposure event explains why HIV is transmitted with moderate efficiency (1 in 200-1 in 2000) by heterosexual sex and apparently greater efficiency through the intestinal tract @ 1 in 20-1 in 300 via semen and upto 95 in 100 in drug users via contaminated sharps.

For a HIV infection to be productive and systemic three factors are very critical (i) Viral load of the donor, in this case millions of sperms implies greater genetic diversity hence increased chances (fitness) because out of the millions very few perhaps only one seed the infection. (ii) Availability of target cells at the site of infection. (iii) Cellular phenotype (Naïve or memory) with HIV preferring memory in most mucosal sites (vagina and rectum).
History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
mburuke
#14 Posted : Monday, February 08, 2010 1:15:02 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 10/3/2008
Posts: 106
Thanks BGL for the insight am wondering
rather than target the replication/polymerase enzyme
which is only expressed in active cells during replication why cant the activity/experssion of enzyme involved in intergration of the virus into the hosts DNA? be silenced and maybe address the issue of the virus remaining dormant and undetected.
One's first step in wisdom is to question everything - and one's last is to come to terms with everything
BGL
#15 Posted : Monday, February 08, 2010 3:46:43 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
@ mburuke: Immunosuppressants + HAART combinations has been proposed to decrease the activation of CD4+ T cells and reduce their susceptibility to viral infection and replication with a cyclosporine A producing interesting results in a controlled clinical trial. However, drug withdrawal causes viral load to return to basal levels. But my position is that general use of immunosuppressants is not justified because of their toxicity.

On the same note, In the laboratory (in vitro) we can design miRNAs which could be involved in maintaining HIV latency or in controlling low ongoing viral replication. However, the dynamics in human body are completely different. HIV dominates the proceedings through strategies that overcome the cellular miRNA restriction machinery or enhance the expression of certain favourable miRNAs to achieve its replication.

By the way, as at dec 2009 we had 25 different active compounds belonging to 6 different drug families that have been developed and approved. However, regardless of the use of all these, a cure is NOT YET ACHIEVABLE.
History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.