Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Betty bayo speaks out
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2009 Posts: 7,912
|
jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice!  Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/9/2008 Posts: 5,389
|
We should also blame church goers for demanding too much from their pastors.....including healing and miracles..... they want their pastors to be like Jesus. They want to hear that someone was healed after being prayed for. They want to see demons and disease and needles coming out of the person being prayed for. They want to hear that someone was cured of AIDS after prayer. This puts lots of pressure on pastors making them result to such kanyari tricks to fulfill the worshippers expectations and remain relevant. Maybe we should be blaming religion and expectations thereof and not the pastor. Blame the game, not the player.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/9/2008 Posts: 5,389
|
MaichBlack wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! If you watched the expose, all that drama, miracles were meant to be captured on tape and then broadcast on TV and radio so that the 40m Kenyans could send 310 bob and request for personal prayers/blessings, and pay even more after the personal prayers. It's marketing 101.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/7/2010 Posts: 1,063 Location: Kenya
|
MaichBlack wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! ...Now you are saying that @jaggernaut's thinking capacity is lower than that of your 5yr old daughter? I dont think so. @jaggernaut has built a business empire witjout conning anybody and using his head properly.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/9/2008 Posts: 5,389
|
Atalaku wrote:MaichBlack wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! ...Now you are saying that @jaggernaut's thinking capacity is lower than that of your 5yr old daughter? I dont think so. @jaggernaut has built a business empire witjout conning anybody and using his head properly. The umpteenth reminder that I am not "him". Though am proud that I have wealthy friends. As they say, a man is judged by the company he keeps, and birds of a feather....... Alama ya dukuduku......
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/27/2007 Posts: 2,768
|
jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. ...and Esther Arunga took alot of blame for the sins of her husband...Ama mimi sikufuata hiyo sarakasi sawasawa??? ...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi
|
jaggernaut wrote:Atalaku wrote:MaichBlack wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:[quote=jaggernaut]Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! ...Now you are saying that @jaggernaut's thinking capacity is lower than that of your 5yr old daughter? I dont think so. @jaggernaut has built a business empire witjout conning anybody and using his The umpteenth reminder that I am not "him". Though am proud that I have wealthy friends. As they say, a man is judged by the company he keeps, and birds of a feather....... Alama ya dukuduku...... @Jagger nige loan we have been friends for a while now... possunt quia posse videntur
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2009 Posts: 7,912
|
Atalaku wrote:MaichBlack wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? Are you being serious right now??? Even my five year old daughter knows the difference!!! ...Now you are saying that @jaggernaut's thinking capacity is lower than that of your 5yr old daughter? I dont think so. @jaggernaut has built a business empire witjout conning anybody and using his head properly. My daughter knows it is wrong to lie - as a means to achieve something, avoid something or just for the heck of it. She knows it is unacceptable and inexcusable! Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/1/2010 Posts: 3,024 Location: Hapa
|
Atalaku wrote:...Now you are saying that @jaggernaut's thinking capacity is lower than that of your 5yr old daughter? I dont think so. @jaggernaut has built a business empire witjout conning anybody and using his head properly. @wakwitu, you should have said "using his head properly and without conning anybody"....when 'without' precedes the other words, it sounds like he did not use his......  Tinda nesa Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. - Muhammad Ali🐝
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 8/4/2008 Posts: 2,849 Location: Rupi
|
jaggernaut wrote:Impunity wrote:jaggernaut wrote:Should a wife be held responsible for the actions of her husband? I believe NO. Otherwise courts should also be jailing wives for crimes committed by their husbands. Therefore Mrs. Betty Kanyari is blameless in this case, she is safi kama pamba. Only if the court can prove the wife was not an accomplice! Kanyari was just producing 'adverts' to market his church. Just like Safaricom, eabl, duracoat etc do by paying and coaching people for an effective ad. Maybe this is what all churches do for the programs they air. And kanyari was only following the standard protocol. His problem may be only firing his assistant who copied the hard disk and sold it to moha. Which begs the question - why did the "mole" happily participate in the fraud for yrs only to leak the files after he was fired? Isn't this the guy who should be "lynched" first? He is so crude this Kanyari guy. He couldn't even offer the ladies producing the adverts a chair while he happily swang around with his chair. Lord, thank you!
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Betty bayo speaks out
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|