Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Other religious discourse
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/21/2010 Posts: 6,675 Location: Nairobi
|
AlphDoti wrote:Muriel wrote:Did he check his opinion with his superiors in Rome? Hii ni kuropokwa tu. This archbishop is not worth his cloth. Quote:"The other day I was praying as I was running and I ended up saying to God: 'Look, this is all very well but isn't it about time you did something – if you're there' – which is probably not what the archbishop of Canterbury should say." What other explanation could he have thought of as a possible reason of 'God's inaction' other than 'if you are there?' (by implication 'you are not there.'). Yes it is strange that the good archbishop can wonder if God exists yet affirm him in the same breath. Why do you think he said it, brother? The same question can be asked about alleged Jesus's (pbuh) words: " My God, Why Have You Forsaken Me?" @Alph Jesus was never on the cross.. Those words were said by Judas Isacriot who God put in the place of Jesus for death after he trying to betray God's messenger! Mark 12:29 Deuteronomy 4:16
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
AlphDoti wrote:Ransom means substitute. Almighty God wanted to test the two men (Abraham and his sons), with self-sacrifice in the service of Allah. When they obeyed the test, God Almighty stopped Abraham from that and substituted for ram. You see @muriel, there is no atonement of sin in Islam. The hereditary thing you're trying to justify, this alleged inherited from Adam. The Church says this thing, which you and I were not personally responsible was to be atoned for. And they say the Creator of this Universe had to sacrifice His only begotten son ( which has been expunged from the Bible by the way  ) to neutralize this mysterious curse. I told you about the British man, Major Yeats Brown who said no heathen tribe has ever conceived such a nonsensical idea. But you are trying to tell us that. I say look my brother @muriel, don't try to pull wool over our eyes. Think man, think! Alphdoti, You are telling me to think? How about you just reading the Qur'an? What itches you that you do not want to refer to the Qur'an instead you rely on silly mzungus whom you accuse a lot in your myriad conspiracy theories? Are they now more trustworthy than your Qur'an? Why have you linked 'ransomed' with 'forgiveness of sins'? Why have you linked 'ransomed' with 'forgiveness of sins'? How many times will I ask that before you answer? You will not go to the church Alphdoti, or even to the Islamic bibles. You will stay in the Qur'an! What is it about the Qur'an you cannot explain what is in it? You would rather talk about mzungu than the quran, silly man. So Allah said "We substituted him with great sacrifice'. So Allah substitutes? You can be destined to meet your fate but Allah will substitute you? Like I can be destined to suffer physical harm (e.g. like the boy) but if I show I am obedient, surrendered, Allah can substitute me so that I do not get harmed instead the lamb gets the harm that was coming to me? In how many different ways will I continue asking the same thing? Is there any muslim out there who can elaborate this issue? Alphdoti cannot say more than he has said. He is going round in circles. Anatapatapa. Anapayuka payuka.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
AlphDoti wrote:Muriel wrote:Did he check his opinion with his superiors in Rome? Hii ni kuropokwa tu. This archbishop is not worth his cloth. Quote:"The other day I was praying as I was running and I ended up saying to God: 'Look, this is all very well but isn't it about time you did something – if you're there' – which is probably not what the archbishop of Canterbury should say." What other explanation could he have thought of as a possible reason of 'God's inaction' other than 'if you are there?' (by implication 'you are not there.'). Yes it is strange that the good archbishop can wonder if God exists yet affirm him in the same breath. Why do you think he said it, brother? The same question can be asked about alleged Jesus's (pbuh) words: " My God, Why Have You Forsaken Me?" Unlike you, there are myriad additional text that can be referred to when talking about that point. Nukuu moja umeshindwa nayo lakini umeona ni jambo la busara kabisa kurukia hoja langu na Ndugu as if umeulizwa swali kulihusu. Mnafiki!!!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
Muriel wrote:AlphDoti wrote:Ransom means substitute. Almighty God wanted to test the two men (Abraham and his sons), with self-sacrifice in the service of Allah. When they obeyed the test, God Almighty stopped Abraham from that and substituted for ram. You see @muriel, there is no atonement of sin in Islam. The hereditary thing you're trying to justify, this alleged inherited from Adam. The Church says this thing, which you and I were not personally responsible was to be atoned for. And they say the Creator of this Universe had to sacrifice His only begotten son ( which has been expunged from the Bible by the way  ) to neutralize this mysterious curse. I told you about the British man, Major Yeats Brown who said no heathen tribe has ever conceived such a nonsensical idea. But you are trying to tell us that. I say look my brother @muriel, don't try to pull wool over our eyes. Think man, think! Alphdoti, You are telling me to think? How about you just reading the Qur'an? What itches you that you do not want to refer to the Qur'an instead you rely on silly mzungus whom you accuse a lot in your myriad conspiracy theories? Are they now more trustworthy than your Qur'an? Why have you linked 'ransomed' with 'forgiveness of sins'? Why have you linked 'ransomed' with 'forgiveness of sins'? How many times will I ask that before you answer? You will not go to the church Alphdoti, or even to the Islamic bibles. You will stay in the Qur'an! What is it about the Qur'an you cannot explain what is in it? You would rather talk about mzungu than the quran, silly man. So Allah said "We substituted him with great sacrifice'. So Allah substitutes? You can be destined to meet your fate but Allah will substitute you? Like I can be destined to suffer physical harm (e.g. like the boy) but if I show I am obedient, surrendered, Allah can substitute me so that I do not get harmed instead the lamb gets the harm that was coming to me? In how many different ways will I continue asking the same thing? Is there any muslim out there who can elaborate this issue? Alphdoti cannot say more than he has said. He is going round in circles. Anatapatapa. Anapayuka payuka. I have told you many times too. That idea of atonement, just drop it, it is not Islamic teaching. Even in the Bible, it was already confirmed by your scholars that it was an interpolation. That verse I have bracketed red has been removed from the Bible. And you insist in clinging to the idea? The story of Abraham and his son Ismael was a test from Almighty God to them for the self-sacrifice in the service of Allah. They obeyed. They passed the test. God Almighty stopped Abraham from that and told him it was a test for his obedience. And in place substituted for ram. What is so hard????
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
@muriel, you say: 1. Jesus (pbuh) died on the cross to pay for your sins 2. You say this is the idea of atonement of sin 3. You say people are born with sin
Don't you know the verses talking about this idea have now been expunged from your Bible?
You see it is the most nonsensical idea on earth. Adam and eve sinning, and you're going to go to hell for that. And the way out is that, the same God now, He knows there is no way, no way He can change these people. So He must come down to earth, go into a woman's womb and live there for 9 months, born like any other human child. With all the blood and the marks and the umbilical code, which made his mother impure for 40 days says the Bible. Circumcised on the 8th day. Living like any other human being, drinking milk from his mothers breast, wetting his napkins, eating food, having a call of nature, and beaten and chased around. Your Almighty God of this universe, He took that role and He died for you at the age of 33...
Please brother what is this? Where did you get these stuff from? Give us an opportunity, it is about time the Muslims took it up. That this most nonsensical idea on earth are getting converts?
Let me read you Quran, Sura Iklas chapter 112:1-4 called The Purity of Faith. In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. 1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; 2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; 3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; 4. And there is none like unto Him.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
AlphDoti wrote:@muriel, you say: 1. Jesus (pbuh) died on the cross to pay for your sins 2. You say this is the idea of atonement of sin 3. You say people are born with sin
Don't you know the verses talking about this idea have now been expunged from your Bible?
You see it is the most nonsensical idea on earth. Adam and eve sinning, and you're going to go to hell for that. And the way out is that, the same God now, He knows there is no way, no way He can change these people. So He must come down to earth, go into a woman's womb and live there for 9 months, born like any other human child. With all the blood and the marks and the umbilical code, which made his mother impure for 40 days says the Bible. Circumcised on the 8th day. Living like any other human being, drinking milk from his mothers breast, wetting his napkins, eating food, having a call of nature, and beaten and chased around. Your Almighty God of this universe, He took that role and He died for you at the age of 33...
Please brother what is this? Where did you get these stuff from? Give us an opportunity, it is about time the Muslims took it up. That this most nonsensical idea on earth are getting converts?
Let me read you Quran, Sura Iklas chapter 112:1-4 called The Purity of Faith. In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. 1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; 2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; 3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; 4. And there is none like unto Him. Link to that Bible? We can start discussing the previous scriptures acknowledged by the Quran and compare it to what you are saying. Still waiting for your response. i.e. what the Quran says not your explanation.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
symbols wrote:AlphDoti wrote:@muriel, you say: 1. Jesus (pbuh) died on the cross to pay for your sins 2. You say this is the idea of atonement of sin 3. You say people are born with sin
Don't you know the verses talking about this idea have now been expunged from your Bible?
You see it is the most nonsensical idea on earth. Adam and eve sinning, and you're going to go to hell for that. And the way out is that, the same God now, He knows there is no way, no way He can change these people. So He must come down to earth, go into a woman's womb and live there for 9 months, born like any other human child. With all the blood and the marks and the umbilical code, which made his mother impure for 40 days says the Bible. Circumcised on the 8th day. Living like any other human being, drinking milk from his mothers breast, wetting his napkins, eating food, having a call of nature, and beaten and chased around. Your Almighty God of this universe, He took that role and He died for you at the age of 33...
Please brother what is this? Where did you get these stuff from? Give us an opportunity, it is about time the Muslims took it up. That this most nonsensical idea on earth are getting converts?
Let me read you Quran, Sura Iklas chapter 112:1-4 called The Purity of Faith. In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. 1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; 2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; 3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; 4. And there is none like unto Him. Link to that Bible? We can start discussing the previous scriptures acknowledged by the Quran and compare it to what you are saying. Still waiting for your response. i.e. what the Quran says not your explanation. @symbol, the verse John 3:16, used when preaching to justify atonement "the only BEGOTTEN!" has now been unceremoniously expunged from the Bible by your Bible revisers as a fabrication. And they didn't tell you of course! If you can lay your hand on the RSV 1952, and compare with newer version. If you were an honest Christian and admit that you cannot consider a footnote as the Word of God. You will be surprised also to realize that Mark chapter 16 ends on verse 8. Now the Bibles put a foot at the bottom of the page as Quote:Mark 16:20 Verses 9–20 are bracketed in NU-Text as not original. They are lacking in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, although nearly all other manuscripts of Mark contain them.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
AlphDoti wrote:symbols wrote:AlphDoti wrote:@muriel, you say: 1. Jesus (pbuh) died on the cross to pay for your sins 2. You say this is the idea of atonement of sin 3. You say people are born with sin
Don't you know the verses talking about this idea have now been expunged from your Bible?
You see it is the most nonsensical idea on earth. Adam and eve sinning, and you're going to go to hell for that. And the way out is that, the same God now, He knows there is no way, no way He can change these people. So He must come down to earth, go into a woman's womb and live there for 9 months, born like any other human child. With all the blood and the marks and the umbilical code, which made his mother impure for 40 days says the Bible. Circumcised on the 8th day. Living like any other human being, drinking milk from his mothers breast, wetting his napkins, eating food, having a call of nature, and beaten and chased around. Your Almighty God of this universe, He took that role and He died for you at the age of 33...
Please brother what is this? Where did you get these stuff from? Give us an opportunity, it is about time the Muslims took it up. That this most nonsensical idea on earth are getting converts?
Let me read you Quran, Sura Iklas chapter 112:1-4 called The Purity of Faith. In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. 1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; 2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; 3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; 4. And there is none like unto Him. Link to that Bible? We can start discussing the previous scriptures acknowledged by the Quran and compare it to what you are saying. Still waiting for your response. i.e. what the Quran says not your explanation. @symbol, the verse John 3:16, used when preaching to justify atonement "the only BEGOTTEN!" has now been unceremoniously expunged from the Bible by your Bible revisers as a fabrication. And they didn't tell you of course! If you can lay your hand on the RSV 1952, and compare with newer version. If you were an honest Christian and admit that you cannot consider a footnote as the Word of God. You will be surprised also to realize that Mark chapter 16 ends on verse 8. Now the Bibles put a foot at the bottom of the page as Quote:Mark 16:20 Verses 9–20 are bracketed in NU-Text as not original. They are lacking in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, although nearly all other manuscripts of Mark contain them. Who are my Bible revisers? Where did I say a footnote is the Word of God? Did I mention Mark? That's the verse from RSV.I don't see anything about atonement there.Are you acknowledging what the RSV 1952 is saying as the Word of God or it's just for convenience?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel, I've spent so much time today thinking about the archbishop of Canterbury in the context of my own spiritual experience. While searching my mind and spirit, his words came over and over.
And as the day closed it dawned on me that till the moment, I had a dearth of pure thought. 'What's a pure thought?' I wondered. After some reflection I saw that a pure thought is one that is totally selfless, and loving. A kind of thought that involves transcending day to day relationships and reality. A kind of thought that's of 'God'. Thoughts of the true Self.
It's interesting that though no man has seen God with his physical eye, seeing the true Self with the spiritual eye one can see 'God' so clearly.
'Indwelling' was the word that came to my head upon these thoughts. And thus was the archbishop's puzzle resolved. He was thinking about the mystical using religious symbols and his socio-political role. He wasn't having the thoughts of the true Self. He was careful and experiencing things around his social status and context. And his context is full of doubt.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Alphdoti
With me you will stay in the quran. I will afford you no diversions.
If the teaching that allah can ransom someone is unislamic then who put that particular teaching in the quran that Allah 'ransomed' someone?
At least that is an easy question that you can answer. Can you answer it?
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Other religious discourse
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|