wazua Fri, Apr 3, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

8 Pages<1234>»
zero interest rate.
Scubidu
#11 Posted : Friday, December 25, 2009 9:07:26 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
Kizee. Are you sure cbk doesn't have a clue about the arbitrage? The cbk is full of smart economists and the last fews T-bill auctions have averaged considerably lower interest rates (including the recent ifdb). Commercial banks liquidity is mopped up during a public auction, then cbk pumps liquidity in the banking system and then Treasury sits on the money because they don't want to tempt inflation by spending it too quickly. I'm just thinking of the precedent being set that banks can lend to govt and simply borrow reserves later. If cbk had not afforded banks this priviledge would these banks chance that liquidity risk amongst themselves?

I had a closer look at 14-15 Dec injections and noticed that the 364 T-bill has caused liquidity problems in that they're few (if any) redemptions since they introduced it in August 2009. There's an interesting correlations on 17 Aug, 12 Oct & 14 Dec when redemptions are either zero or smaller than amounts raised. The next 364 T-bill is expected on 8 Feb 2010 raising 8.5b with zero redemptions expected.

A friend of mine sent me the crr changes over the last 25 years. Check it out below.

(Dec-1986) = 6.0%
(1995) = 20.0%
(Dec-1997) = 15.0%
(Sept-1998) = 13.0%
(Dec-1998) = 12.0%
(Oct-2000) = 10.0%
(Jun-2003) = 6.0%
(Nov-2008) = 5.0%
(Jul-2009) = 4.5%

The money multiplier on a 20% crr is 5 <(5 = 1/0.2)> but our current multiplier is 22.2, so it works well (liquidity-wise) for banks when the crr is lowered, but not vice versa. The crr cannot be adjusted upwards very easily. I think this is because if the crr is adjusted upwards and the cbk tightens its policy, it will mean a more severe contraction in money supply (when the cbk finally starts selling government securities on the open market to mop up liquidity to combat inflation).

How much lower will our crr go? Some countries have no crr (0%). Do we need one? Cbk injected 16 bn between 10-15 Dec which represents 3.6% of Oct-09 M1 (443 bn). M1 comprises currency in circulation (paper notes and coins) and demand deposits (current accounts) which is money the public demands because they use them to buy stuff. The implied assumption in a 4.5% crr is that banks currently only need 4.5% in cash reserves to service currency demands from the public, but if they can borrow as much overnight (with ease) why have a crr? Between February 1972 to May 1978 Kenya's crr was 0%.

Merry xmas
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
imanyara
#12 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 5:37:01 AM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 5
Location: kenya
what we need to see is banks increasing their lending . And if a crr of 0% will stimulate lending am for it
kizee
#13 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 6:27:23 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
@scubidu...if cbk were indeed aware why does the arbitrage still exist?...what u shud be looking at is the trend of interbank overnite rates vs tbond rates...better still t-bill rates then ask urself if cbk kno wat theyr doin
Scubidu
#14 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 10:35:19 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@imanyara. I think to see banks lending we need the govt to stop borrowing. Many will say that we don't have the discipline to maintain a 0% crr but, we have seen the cbk is more than willing to support banks with liquidity.

@Kizee. Well you have a good point on interbank rates and t-bond rates. As that guy Salmon Khan argued that savings accounts are essentially lent long term because of the illusion that banks are safe (backed by CBK & DPF). So is there an arbitrage opportunity between our savings rate of 1.8% and 12yr YTM of 12.5%?

Cbk can't lend to govt directly, so they know they have to do it indirectly through banks. This is why I think they are well aware of the arbitrage. I think that's why they put a lot of emphasis on establishing the horz repo facility (though I wonder if the rates are almost the same). cbk wants to exert minimum influence on rates, but Treasury's deficit borrowing makes sure they can't do this.

I don't know why 91-day bill rates are at 7%, maybe there's a spread of 400 bp to repo rates that cbk is comfortable with, as an incentive for banks to lend to the govt.
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
kizee
#15 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 11:32:09 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
theres arbitrage between cbk repo rates and the tbill rates ....if u borrow money from cbk for say 91 days the max u will pay is 3.5-i.e u do 15 day repos and keep rolling over the repo..u can place the money for 91 days with GoK at 6.7pct...arbitrage...basically what im sayin is that the steepness of our yield curve allows u to borrow short term and lend long term and make cash...cbk dont lend directly to GoK but cbk do whatever it takes to make sure GoK get the cash as u said they lend to banks to lend to GoK...so GoK end up payin a spread on their own funds..so what U are sayin is that cbk allow u to arbitrage them and GoK..cbk=gok rite?
Scubidu
#16 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 1:11:04 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
Thank Kizee. I think I understand this arbitrage thing much better now. We should do a tutorial on this kinda stuff, maybe even a video on youtube...explain what we think is going at cbk to validate our assumptions. It could be fun. Yes that's is what I meant...I think. That GoK ends up paying the spread...I think (not to sure).

What that Salmon Khan guy was saying is that 100% of the funds in our savings account are available to the banks to do with what it pleases (including invest in gov securities) while at the same time 100% is supposedly at the customers disposal (through our ATMS). So he argues savings accounts are more long term loans than short term because they are rolled over everyday and are less likely to be withdrawn because we trust the banking system.

So in conclusion he says that in the grand scheme of things our entire banking system is geared toward allowing banking to arbitrage the yield curve. What you think of that? Does it make sense?

Watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SAMey9Gl5I
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
kizee
#17 Posted : Monday, December 28, 2009 8:02:03 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
scubidu..are we being sarcastic?? if you think im not makin sense or are mistaken please say so...anywho ..i dont lyk youtube..wenever i start typin you my pc automaticaly directs to youporn..go figure!..but yes GoK are payin the spread U are rite man... some yield curves are easier to arbitrage than others....arbitrage disappears wen too many arbitrageurs(sp??) seek to exploit it

ur assertion that cbk wud be comfortable being arbitraged(to beg a phrase) is amazin..which economic agent be they public or private wud be? come on man!thats not all the arbitrage that cbk allow fin markets to benefit from..the clowns hav an on and off fx auction wherein they post at 11.00 that they will be buyin X number of USD from the market...all bids to be tenderd by 12.00..is this a very brite way of doin things in ur view?
imanyara
#18 Posted : Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:20:13 AM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 5
Location: kenya
Keep posting guys, I'm learning so much from you
QD
#19 Posted : Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:32:56 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/5/2009
Posts: 597
the arbitrage aside,looking at commercial banks with surplus willing to lend and the public willing to borrow. with the current economic situation the banks will end up with more unserviced loans Q1 2010 as the same Gok is doing crowding out by selling Tbill and bonds in small bands that the common man can purchase. rem these auctions are not redeemable in short time.so the banks money lent tied by the Gok result low liquidity, inflation up , no stimulus and stagnating economy. any more solution
The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence
kizee
#20 Posted : Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:59:45 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
why is GoK borrowin soo much? plus why are they borrowin soo much yet 100pct of revenue goes to recurrent xpenditure? GoK need to tighten theyr belts like the rest of us and stop competing with banks for deposits bcoz thats wat cuttin the minimum amount one can bid for a tbill from 1mio to 100k means...so 2010 may be characterized by higher depo rates paid out by banks and invariably higher lending rates..unless of course if banks are willing to reduce their margins which i doubt
8 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.