Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Moon Landing that never was....
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,333 Location: Masada
|
McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.  for yrs you've never met google, why are you pushing this to others when in the whole thread and even today it is you and @thimioni who were alleging that no landing ever took place!!!! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,333 Location: Masada
|
McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.  for yrs you've never met google, why are you pushing this to others when in the whole thread and even today it is you and @thimioni who were alleging that no landing ever took place!!!! So if google is updated by people who are easy to convince like you then we should just accept and move on that "man landed on the moon in 1963"? SMH. Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.  for yrs you've never met google, why are you pushing this to others when in the whole thread and even today it is you and @thimioni who were alleging that no landing ever took place!!!! So if google is updated by people who are easy to convince like you then we should just accept and move on that "man landed on the moon in 1963"? SMH.  Who updates google? It can only give links.......I must say that you are running on empty here my friend, any counter arguments to mine?......ZILCH? Please google and show me a google link with what I have posted, research my friend, research......otherwise you got no business telling everybody how good an engineer you are as you look down upon other wazuans in matters knowledge!!!! This should be facts against facts, achana na side shows!!!! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/20/2007 Posts: 4,432
|
there's nothing more to say Jose: If I make it through this thug life, I'll see you one day. The Lord is the only way to stop the hurt.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,333 Location: Masada
|
McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.  for yrs you've never met google, why are you pushing this to others when in the whole thread and even today it is you and @thimioni who were alleging that no landing ever took place!!!! So if google is updated by people who are easy to convince like you then we should just accept and move on that "man landed on the moon in 1963"? SMH.  Who updates google? It can only give links.......I must say that you are running on empty here my friend, any counter arguments to mine?......ZILCH? Please google and show me a google link with what I have posted, research my friend, research......otherwise you got no business telling everybody how good an engineer you are as you look down upon other wazuans in matters knowledge!!!! This should be facts against facts, achana na side shows!!!! You cant go copy pasting someone's opinion and expect us to take that as gospel truth...sickening! The difference between you and my typist is the same though. Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
 To start with some quick stats from NASA: The Saturn V rocket that sent Apollo to the moon was 111M tall, weighed 2.8M KG and was designed to launch 50 tons all the way to the moon! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Impunity wrote:McReggae wrote:Anybody who loves Physics and understands the same will understand that the best evidence for the moon landings are the retroreflectors that were planted during the Apollo missions. A retroreflector is a surface that reflects all incident light rays in a parallel but opposite direction to the incoming ray. The ultimate effect is that regardless of the angle of incidence, the light ray will go back towards it's source. The retroreftletors planted by the Apollo mission can be accessed even now, you only need to aim a steady laser light at the prescribed position on the surface of the moon and you'll get the reflection a mere 3 seconds later. There is no other explanation for this reflection since no natural surface can ever reflect a laser light from the surface of the moon with such little scattering of the beam that it gets noticed back on earth.
The Soviets planted some additional retroreflectors on the moon's surface in 1970 and 1973. These retroreflectors called Lunokhods are also visible from the earth using laser ranging equipment.
Anybody who still insists that the landings never took place is just ae lazy person who refuses to do research and would rather spread the gutter of conspiracy theorists!!!! You will kill people like @harrydre and @washiku for no reason at all. Wachia hapo!  I hope all your doubts have now all been erased, those who wanna continue we can now delve into the real physics of how it happened!!! Google sio mbaya! ION:If you want some people to live longer kindly dont mention "physics" in the same thread they have accessed to.  for yrs you've never met google, why are you pushing this to others when in the whole thread and even today it is you and @thimioni who were alleging that no landing ever took place!!!! So if google is updated by people who are easy to convince like you then we should just accept and move on that "man landed on the moon in 1963"? SMH.  Who updates google? It can only give links.......I must say that you are running on empty here my friend, any counter arguments to mine?......ZILCH? Please google and show me a google link with what I have posted, research my friend, research......otherwise you got no business telling everybody how good an engineer you are as you look down upon other wazuans in matters knowledge!!!! This should be facts against facts, achana na side shows!!!! You cant go copy pasting someone's opinion and expect us to take that as gospel truth...sickening! The difference between you and my typist is the same though.  Busted.....bonoko, this is really getting into your skin.....facts are different from opinions, opinions can be challenged but facts can't, you only get them through research and establishment of the truth, you ego can't allow you to learn though ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi
|
@Makerenge and @Impurity - i think many people are lost since you guys are talking about a type of 'landing' that is different from what they know/used to. All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
A quick google search to what I have posted above (anybody should try) only leads you to wazua!!!!.......confirming that I have done no copy pasting!!!! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Moon Landing that never was....
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|