Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
Swenani wrote:@muriel and company, when are you people coming up with a thread about "The science of eating fish"? It already exists and goes to the spiritual
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How am i Big brother?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person?
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Swenani wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends All these you've mentioned are systems, connections, paths on different dimensions connected.
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
tycho wrote:Swenani wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends All these you've mentioned are systems, connections, paths on different dimensions connected. once connected, they make a person If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? another
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|