Welcome back guru. Muhammad was a man, just like Opiyo and Kimondiu. Only that he was a successful war general. He was not a prophet. But yes, prophets can sin. BUT they must not claim revelations after that to justify themselves. Then force those imaginations on people as God's word. I'm glad you implied Muhammad sinned. One of your brothers told me he never did!

Some professional enemies of Islam use marriage life of the prophet as animosity towards Islam. These non-believers has chosen this as their role in life, to attack the person of prophet. And I have read these accusations by kina @kyt, @lonest, @muganda, and other people here in @Wazua.

My response will be that their problem is not really the prophet married Aisha. Their problem is that they don't believe he is the messenger of Allah. They don't believe that he was receiving revelation. So their problem runs deeper.

The issue of bringing up Aisha is just a front, in order to attack Islam. Even if the prophet didn't do it, they would still be attacking. If we tell you this was divinely instructed, you will still say how convenient it is whenever something that seems strange, you say that God commanded.

Then I say we need to discuss the issue of whether the prophet was the prophet of Allah or not. And that would settle the argument. If he is the prophet of Allah, then we have no right to question what Allah told him to do. If we establish that he was a messenger of Allah receiving revelation from Allah, then whatever Allah tells him to do we should accept it. Because Allah owes nothing to us and we owe everything to Him.

So the enemies of Islam are attacking the marriage to Aisha, even if it didn't happen they would still be attacking Islam, because they don't believe in it. They don't believe that the prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) was a messenger of Allah. They don't believe he was receiving revelations from Allah.

So it is pointless to argue regarding Aisha (ra) because they have a major problem and that they don't accept him altogether.

This reminds me of the time when the Quraish were attacking the prophet, and Allah said in the Quran:
"They are not disbelieving you, they disbelieveing the message of Allah."

It means they were not attacking him, but they were attacking the message. They were not attacking his personality just because of his personality, they were attacking him because he was conveying the message of Allah to them.

Welcome back @Alphdoti, @guru267 seemed to be fighting a lone battle

About Muhammad and his being a prophet of Allah... not sure you can find even a single post where I've discussed that issue.

Because Jews doubt Jesus, Christians disbelief Muhammad's mission, Muslims are sure Christians got lost somewhere, Agnostics disbelieve them all, etc. Does it make them bad, I cannot judge. God is Infinite, and his ways greater than the way his creation perceives him. Have you pondered how chance plays into what faith you profess?

Now a man's words, his actions, the fruit of his beliefs, those speak to me.

@Lolest! I am not going to spend more time trying to convince you adoption is not allowed in Islam and a foster child will never ever ever have parents until they are formally adopted. Wallow in ignorance if you must!

Moving on...

David was also a man, just like Opiyo and Kimondiu. Only he was a successful war general. BUT.... WAIT FOR IT... according to the both of us David is one of God's most beloved prophets! And oh did David sin?? YEEEESSS!!!

Maybe you can show me a few significant differences between the man David and the man Muhammad??

So explain to me why my beloved Muhammad (saw) is from Satan??

And don't try and escape the questions or risk exposing yourself here!

just curious... (As), (RA) ni nini? I know (SAW) but not these other phrases.