As opposed to making the original companies who were the initiators of the scam pay for the land now?

What did the current buyers do wrong to make them have to pay yet again for land they bought believing it was clean, after due diligence was done?

Seriously? That makes sense?

@mkenyan,
Mau land is useful to all of us for rain,air etc.
Kevevapi land at the point of alienation was just idle. This makes the difference on the two.

Govt allocates land to private citizens eg 1,400 acre donholm land all the way from muthurwa to donholm or karen land thousands of acres aloocated to Karen blixen.

When this land becomes property of private citizens, and these citizens decide to subdivide the land further, city council comes in and says x% of the land is to be set aside for public utility eg schools, police station etc. Karen police station and karen dispensary land were once paet of Karen Blixen's private land.

Most of the schools in donholm along jogoo road were once porperty of donholm rpivate farm.

These % set aside are what is usually seen in the media as GRABBED land. This land has been set aside for a particular use eg land set aside for school to serve donholm. If @mkenyan grabs the land and builds flats, the people living in the area have no recourse other than demolishing the flats to build a school. If karen blixen gave out land for a hospital then @mkenyan comes to build flats, then the flats should be brought down as in the recent case below in karen.

....

On the intended use of kevevapi, am basing my arguments on what i see in the media. I cant know of what kevevapi wants to do with the land. I can only guess. kevevapi are licenced to deal with agric use so logically, i can only assume they will want to demolish the houses and continue with agric use. From this usage, unless CS agric divulges to us on what he intends to reuse the land for, i cant tell.

@ash ock, if am given the option to buy the land or to have my house demolished, i would grab the land buy option very fast and deal with other issues with the original companies later.

I beleive the complexities of tracking these companies who have had over 20 years to plan on hiding would be asking for too much. The current CS agric has put his foot forward in that he wants money now as in today, from whichever source , or he brings down the houses, which he has even started.

i agree. best option is pay for it now and go after the companies/individuals who sold the land. whatever you get is a bonus. coz am very sure the companies are long wound up (or can be wound up now that they would be facing millions in damages) and the individuals long gone ( or would apply for bankruptcy or hightail it from kenya) and no meaningful money would be recovered from them. well, unless nssf is found liable in which case the workers...