wazua Fri, Mar 20, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

127 Pages«<2122232425>»
UNAITAS
jerry
#221 Posted : Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:01:28 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/29/2006
Posts: 2,570
yosie14 wrote:
Murang'a wrote:
@guru I support your argument, Unaitas dividends are normally calculated on the basis of no. of shares held as per the books closure i.e 31st Dec regardless of when you bought them.

Minimum shares is 100 and you can have shares but no deposits eg I have shares but my account balance is below 500.

I usually set aside the cash that am willing to buy shares in the Sacco and place the money in fixed deposits such that they mature by early Dec and then I buy shares before their books closure.


aiiii if this is the case then they conned me.My first purchase was in 2012 and the dividend I received last year was for 6 months since I invested in june.Its also possible they changed the policy

@yossie14. You need to change your signature to avoid being conned!
The opposite of courage is not cowardice, it's conformity.
BGL
#222 Posted : Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:00:29 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
UNAITAS pays dividends depending on when you invested with them yaani prorated. For one simple reason: [The sharebook is open and shares bought are freshly introduced into the register]. This is a FACT! if in doubt go to any branch and ask or send them a tweet.
History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
yosie14
#223 Posted : Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:42:05 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/17/2013
Posts: 118
jerry wrote:
yosie14 wrote:
Murang'a wrote:
@guru I support your argument, Unaitas dividends are normally calculated on the basis of no. of shares held as per the books closure i.e 31st Dec regardless of when you bought them.

Minimum shares is 100 and you can have shares but no deposits eg I have shares but my account balance is below 500.

I usually set aside the cash that am willing to buy shares in the Sacco and place the money in fixed deposits such that they mature by early Dec and then I buy shares before their books closure.


aiiii if this is the case then they conned me.My first purchase was in 2012 and the dividend I received last year was for 6 months since I invested in june.Its also possible they changed the policy

@yossie14. You need to change your signature to avoid being conned!


Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
U have really cracked me up why lie
KCB,NMG,PAFR
guru267
#224 Posted : Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:50:37 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/21/2010
Posts: 6,675
Location: Nairobi
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??



Mark 12:29
Deuteronomy 4:16
BGL
#225 Posted : Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:46:13 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231


History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
guru267
#226 Posted : Thursday, May 08, 2014 1:01:43 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/21/2010
Posts: 6,675
Location: Nairobi
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231




Story mingi and still no explanation on HOW the pro rating is done!

I guess ill just wait for my dividend cheque and see...
Mark 12:29
Deuteronomy 4:16
BGL
#227 Posted : Thursday, May 08, 2014 1:30:44 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/11/2009
Posts: 1,223
guru267 wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231




Story mingi and still no explanation on HOW the pro rating is done!

I guess ill just wait for my dividend cheque and see...


Dividends have been PAID but if you are waiting for a dividend cheque you will wait for eternity. The dividend is in your dividend account and can be accessed from any UNAITAS branch in Kenya.

Back to pro rating and how it is done.
The opening balance (i guess you know what this means)....what you hold as at jan 01 earns full dividend which in our case is 9%

For the payments made during the year
The formula is Amount invested*9%*([12-x]/12)
x = month you invested

An Example: Lets assume Mme Guru and M. Bgl Inc both had 1Mn worth of shares by 31/12/2012.They both add 150,000 worth of shares in different times with Mme Guru investing in March and M. Bgl investing in Sept.
While both will have 1.15million shares as at 31/12/2013
Mme Guru will earn more dividend (100,125) compared to M.Bgl (93,375)
History will not remember you for your IQ. It will remember you for what you did. “Genius is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” Thomas Edison
Murang'a
#228 Posted : Thursday, May 08, 2014 9:04:47 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/3/2014
Posts: 131
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231




Story mingi and still no explanation on HOW the pro rating is done!

I guess ill just wait for my dividend cheque and see...


Dividends have been PAID but if you are waiting for a dividend cheque you will wait for eternity. The dividend is in your dividend account and can be accessed from any UNAITAS branch in Kenya.

Back to pro rating and how it is done.
The opening balance (i guess you know what this means)....what you hold as at jan 01 earns full dividend which in our case is 9%

For the payments made during the year
The formula is Amount invested*9%*([12-x]/12)
x = month you invested

An Example: Lets assume Mme Guru and M. Bgl Inc both had 1Mn worth of shares by 31/12/2012.They both add 150,000 worth of shares in different times with Mme Guru investing in March and M. Bgl investing in Sept.
While both will have 1.15million shares as at 31/12/2013
Mme Guru will earn more dividend (100,125) compared to M.Bgl (93,375)

@ BGL please confirm if what you are saying is true.
I have already called two guys who work in the sacco and they have confirmed dividends are paid the same way as NSE listed companies do.
I highly doubt they are wrong because I have been depositing cash irregularly since 2011 and I always countercheck my dividends.
IMITATION IS LIMITATION
guru267
#229 Posted : Friday, May 09, 2014 4:09:58 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/21/2010
Posts: 6,675
Location: Nairobi
Murang'a wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231




Story mingi and still no explanation on HOW the pro rating is done!

I guess ill just wait for my dividend cheque and see...


Dividends have been PAID but if you are waiting for a dividend cheque you will wait for eternity. The dividend is in your dividend account and can be accessed from any UNAITAS branch in Kenya.

Back to pro rating and how it is done.
The opening balance (i guess you know what this means)....what you hold as at jan 01 earns full dividend which in our case is 9%

For the payments made during the year
The formula is Amount invested*9%*([12-x]/12)
x = month you invested

An Example: Lets assume Mme Guru and M. Bgl Inc both had 1Mn worth of shares by 31/12/2012.They both add 150,000 worth of shares in different times with Mme Guru investing in March and M. Bgl investing in Sept.
While both will have 1.15million shares as at 31/12/2013
Mme Guru will earn more dividend (100,125) compared to M.Bgl (93,375)

@ BGL please confirm if what you are saying is true.
I have already called two guys who work in the sacco and they have confirmed dividends are paid the same way as NSE listed companies do.
I highly doubt they are wrong because I have been depositing cash irregularly since 2011 and I always countercheck my dividends.


Merçi Applause
Mark 12:29
Deuteronomy 4:16
Murang'a
#230 Posted : Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:53:47 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/3/2014
Posts: 131
guru267 wrote:
Murang'a wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
BGL wrote:
guru267 wrote:
Share capital as at 31 Dec 2013 = 692,570,359
Proposed dividend as at same date = 61,826,149 (9%)

Someone explain to me how this will be pro rated because I don't get it??





Mme guru267 you are VERY wrong! I have been on this thing since 2010.
To prove it i will (if you want) send you financial statements from 2009 and you can explain the variance between the calculated dividends and the paid dividend. This variance is brought about by the prorating that i am talking about it. To begin with in 2013: this 9% you are quoting has a variance of 505,183 as a result of pro ration

If someone wants these financial statements put email here and do your calculations.
FYI it is only on 2011 when UNAITAS was under investigation from CMA that the calculated dividend was equal to the paid amount

here are my calculations
year * share cap * 9% * proposed * variance
2013* 692570359 * 62331332 * 61826149* 505,183
2012* 404249805 * 36382482 * 31624690* 4,775,792
2011* 233080592 * 20977253 * 20977253* Nil
2010* 176475431 * 15882789 * 14118034* 1,764,755
2009* 107223076 * 9650077 * 8577846 * 1,072,231




Story mingi and still no explanation on HOW the pro rating is done!

I guess ill just wait for my dividend cheque and see...


Dividends have been PAID but if you are waiting for a dividend cheque you will wait for eternity. The dividend is in your dividend account and can be accessed from any UNAITAS branch in Kenya.

Back to pro rating and how it is done.
The opening balance (i guess you know what this means)....what you hold as at jan 01 earns full dividend which in our case is 9%

For the payments made during the year
The formula is Amount invested*9%*([12-x]/12)
x = month you invested

An Example: Lets assume Mme Guru and M. Bgl Inc both had 1Mn worth of shares by 31/12/2012.They both add 150,000 worth of shares in different times with Mme Guru investing in March and M. Bgl investing in Sept.
While both will have 1.15million shares as at 31/12/2013
Mme Guru will earn more dividend (100,125) compared to M.Bgl (93,375)

@ BGL please confirm if what you are saying is true.
I have already called two guys who work in the sacco and they have confirmed dividends are paid the same way as NSE listed companies do.
I highly doubt they are wrong because I have been depositing cash irregularly since 2011 and I always countercheck my dividends.


Merçi Applause

Bienvenue
IMITATION IS LIMITATION
127 Pages«<2122232425>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.