Rank: Elder Joined: 12/17/2009 Posts: 3,583 Location: Kenya
|
TAZ wrote:kaka2za wrote:nakujua wrote:TAZ wrote:@Nakujua....
"I cannot be too critical because, if I was in this position, I don't know if I would do the same. But at the same time this is not Premier League. This is not the best league in the world. This is football from the 19th century." my point is even though he called it football from the 19th century - he also suggested he would do the same, its not an issue of 'nyani haoni kundule ...!', its more an issue of 'nyani ameona kundule ...!'  For me it is OK for low table teams fighting for survival on low budgets to play negative because you don't expect any different from coaches such as Big Sam(BTW even west ham supporters loathe him) It is another thing for one of the most expensively assembled team,with abundant talents to resort to anti-football. Abramovic didn't sack Mourinho last time for not winning,he wanted attractive football. Earlier in the season there were reports indicating that Abramovich wanted Chelsea to play good free flowing football, soon enough he will get tired of Mourinho's tactics....kama Real Madrid! why would he want attractive football and then bring back Mourinho, given his history. Anyway Chelsea are the third highest scoring team in the current epl season - thats hardly negative, or boring football, a good manager will play to his sides strength and for chelsea its the beautiful defensive discipline, how I wish arsenal ditched the so called attractive football.
|