Angelica _ann wrote:Aguytrying wrote:dunkang wrote:@Mweke, ain't that ILLEGAL! How can they put a 2014 transaction into the 2013 Financial Report.
That means they have been lying to shareholders about their true value! TRANSCENTURY, just like HOMEAFRIKA, is criminal enterprises!
private clubs @obiero will love this!
untouchable, toothless CMA!
This RVR transaction is terrible news but my understanding of the way the information has been presented is that there is no illegality, let me explain my reading of this.
The profit warning statement says the projected profit for year ending 31 Dec 2014 will be lower, that means this RVR transaction will be captured in the 2014 financials. For 2013 results the only thing they have done is to state about the RVR transaction that happened after the 2013 financial year. They are saying the RVR transaction happened in 2014 after the 2013 year had ended, it does not mean the RVR transaction is in the 2013 accounts.
Presumably, Transcentury want when someone reads the 2013 financial results they should be aware that in 2014 there will be a significant dip in profitability due to the loss incurred by this RVR transaction. If this presumption is right then they are actually doing a good thing by disclosing this info within the 2013 financial statements.
Now having said that I see no illegality in how this has been handled and presented, it does not mean I am happy with this RVR transaction. In our stock market dealings, we all make and lose money but to see Transcentury lose so much of their investors money (at least 25% dip in profits means at least 125m will be lost) is painful.
My two cents...