If the president is elected by popular suffrage,then he should be the CEO to run the day today affairs of the Government - determine how the tax payers funds are utilized.
He cant do that if he is not the one to appoint and chair the cabinet.
What we require in such a scenario is checks and balances to guard against such excess as the Aglo Leasing and Goldenbergs.
Alternatively,we could go the way of parliamentary Governace where the PM is CEO. In such a situation we do not necessarily need to have a president and if we decide to have one,he is not to be elected by the people directly. Parliament can pick a nice looking guy to perform such ceremonial duties as preside over state functions etc.
Personally this is not a favourite.
If we mix the two,then whoever is mandated directly by the people should be the boss,unto whom any other mainstream Govt officer reports.
B.timer
Dunia ni msongamano..