wazua Thu, May 7, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

15 Pages<1234>»
Love tension
symbols
#11 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 10:47:19 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/19/2013
Posts: 2,552
Muriel wrote:
symbols wrote:
Overflow.

Unkeepable.

Why?
meow
#12 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 11:26:36 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 4/11/2009
Posts: 48
k
tycho
#13 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:54:11 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
I thought about you @AlphDoti as I was starting the thread, and I wondered whether I also wanted to make love with/to you. And the answer, was 'yes!' And I find this as both 'natural' and 'good'. And alas, the more I think, and look, the more I realize that am in a moral realm I had imagined impossible before.

But I must not lose you my love, with my distant thoughts. It would be better if I begin with your post. You say that beauty is attractive, yet the attraction must be handled in a socially acceptable manner, so that one doesn't infringe on another's property.

Indeed, you go as far as positing that, if one is heavily laden with love tension, then he/ she should 'marry'. Hahaha! Just like Paul of Tarsus posits. And even more fundamentally, the impulse must be denied by not looking, and by covering.

That 'marriage' is about being another's property is hardly questionable. But how valid, or true is the idea of property? Can one be another's property?

Is covering, and refusing to look, a sound basis of morality? I doubt it. For it denies beauty, and consequently 'love'. That's why the word 'lust' crept into your post. Talk about love, is so difficult to sustain!












tycho
#14 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:57:29 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
KulaRaha wrote:
The green herb is flowing today.....


Healing is indeed flowing today. Love heals, and must flow to the other. . .
washiku
#15 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:59:58 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
tycho wrote:
I thought about you @AlphDoti as I was starting the thread, and I wondered whether I also wanted to make love with/to you. And the answer, was 'yes!' And I find this as both 'natural' and 'good'. And alas, the more I think, and look, the more I realize that am in a moral realm I had imagined impossible before.

But I must not lose you my love, with my distant thoughts. It would be better if I begin with your post. You say that beauty is attractive, yet the attraction must be handled in a socially acceptable manner, so that one doesn't infringe on another's property.

Indeed, you go as far as positing that, if one is heavily laden with love tension, then he/ she should 'marry'. Hahaha! Just like Paul of Tarsus posits. And even more fundamentally, the impulse must be denied by not looking, and by covering.

That 'marriage' is about being another's property is hardly questionable. But how valid, or true is the idea of property? Can one be another's property?

Is covering, and refusing to look, a sound basis of morality? I doubt it. For it denies beauty, and consequently 'love'. That's why the word 'lust' crept into your post. Talk about love, is so difficult to sustain!

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Ati making love to @Alpha....smile smile











tycho
#16 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:07:21 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
symbols wrote:
Overflow.


'Overflow' means also 'containment'. Like vessels, or 'Kli'. Pots. Overflowing. Into other vessels. That's beautiful!
tycho
#17 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:11:47 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
symbols wrote:
Muriel wrote:
symbols wrote:
Overflow.

Unkeepable.

Why?


'Unkeepable' is 'uncontainable'. Why is love unkeepable? Because it's alive and growing beyond any container serving it.
tycho
#18 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:14:11 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
washiku wrote:
tycho wrote:
I thought about you @AlphDoti as I was starting the thread, and I wondered whether I also wanted to make love with/to you. And the answer, was 'yes!' And I find this as both 'natural' and 'good'. And alas, the more I think, and look, the more I realize that am in a moral realm I had imagined impossible before.

But I must not lose you my love, with my distant thoughts. It would be better if I begin with your post. You say that beauty is attractive, yet the attraction must be handled in a socially acceptable manner, so that one doesn't infringe on another's property.

Indeed, you go as far as positing that, if one is heavily laden with love tension, then he/ she should 'marry'. Hahaha! Just like Paul of Tarsus posits. And even more fundamentally, the impulse must be denied by not looking, and by covering.

That 'marriage' is about being another's property is hardly questionable. But how valid, or true is the idea of property? Can one be another's property?

Is covering, and refusing to look, a sound basis of morality? I doubt it. For it denies beauty, and consequently 'love'. That's why the word 'lust' crept into your post. Talk about love, is so difficult to sustain!

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Ati making love to @Alpha....smile smile













Why @Washiku? Do you think you are exempted?
tycho
#19 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:15:44 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
del.
washiku
#20 Posted : Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:25:17 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
tycho wrote:
washiku wrote:
tycho wrote:
I thought about you @AlphDoti as I was starting the thread, and I wondered whether I also wanted to make love with/to you. And the answer, was 'yes!' And I find this as both 'natural' and 'good'. And alas, the more I think, and look, the more I realize that am in a moral realm I had imagined impossible before.

But I must not lose you my love, with my distant thoughts. It would be better if I begin with your post. You say that beauty is attractive, yet the attraction must be handled in a socially acceptable manner, so that one doesn't infringe on another's property.

Indeed, you go as far as positing that, if one is heavily laden with love tension, then he/ she should 'marry'. Hahaha! Just like Paul of Tarsus posits. And even more fundamentally, the impulse must be denied by not looking, and by covering.

That 'marriage' is about being another's property is hardly questionable. But how valid, or true is the idea of property? Can one be another's property?

Is covering, and refusing to look, a sound basis of morality? I doubt it. For it denies beauty, and consequently 'love'. That's why the word 'lust' crept into your post. Talk about love, is so difficult to sustain!

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Ati making love to @Alpha....smile smile













Why @Washiku? Do you think you are exempted?


Of course am exempted. There is no way I can be part of that. No way!!!
15 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.