Just to clarify about that post,I made a comment about the language that the writer used.Infact I did not say that i agree or disagree with the content,i just took issue with the language he used to express himself.@ alma came with his usual long,opinionated posts,mentioning only one point from the writers article,and launched an attack.I have no problem with him accepting and glorifying such profane writing,however,i have a problem with a member deciding to call name,insult,demean and disparage other members in the name of airing his opinion.That is what i was i exchanging with @alma about.It is long since i exchanged with alma,i made a mistake to respond last night,but it is kind of good because then other members got another chance to see the kind of man that he is.He calls me a boy,but i have to wonder if that name does not aptly desribe him.I have said before in this forum that we can disagree and debate,but keep it civil and decent.Alma has failed that test.Now lean forward and enjoy @ almas dirt(his words ) as his response to this post.
We can all sit behind our computers and type all manner of things,but we choose not to.I wonder if these are posts he would show to his own kids as a sign of his measure as a man.
I did not know i have a 2 pm gang,i am a different time zone,so I don see how i post at 2pm..I guess that is a term @alma coined to refer to anyone who supports Jubilee and does not find his lectures here amusing.To that,i say ,long live the gang !
And for you admin,the answer to such characters is to ask members to ignore them? What is your role as admin(s)?
I am happy