In recognition of the rise of the symbolic order in Wazua, I appeal to @Wazua admin to move all symbolic interactionism to this thread.

The likes of @tycho, @symbol, and lately @muriel can all utilize their symbolism in their interaction and meanings

They can attach new meaning to symbols. They can amuse themselves in the language to negotiate the meaning through symbols. And modifies each thought in the interpretation of the symbols in different points of view.

Is that fair?

@admin please move the "symbols" from:
1. African traditional religion(s) and philosophy in a new world
2. Declaration of War in Wazua

I'll start it off What is fair to who and why?

Affirmative.

Their posts are very tiring.

The 4 symbolic geeks should come here and converse amongst themselves.

You got me on that one
Let me articulate myself, proclaim that 'fair' symbolize all of us. Which modifies and is manifested in the word 'just'. I hope that meaning has been negotiated impartially, and accepted universally now?

u forgot to mention their latest recruit @ kysse

#yaaawns#

Alas kumbe @AlphDoti you have wit!
But seconded in full This abstract theorizing from @tycho, @symbols, @muriel et al can get exasperating for simpletons like me...forgive me fellows for sounding a bit harsh but at times you sound as if you are in love with the sound of your own voices.
Happy holidays

Laugh
Laugh
Laugh

MTS -The three in one,kama Trinity.

Ditto!!!!

Interesting! I thought all conversation is 'symbolic interactionism' and that if there's anything to be spoken about then it's the symbol and the meaning given to it. And that they have everything to do with the threads that @AlphDoti has given. Then of course, @tycho has been engaged in those threads; so does that mean then he shouldn't participate in them?

Or that a quarantine is required?

One wonders if there's ever a compulsion on one to respond to a post, or one must always be pleased or entertained by a post.

But you can bet by now, I understand how normal threads of Mcreggae's tastes look like; they are the ones that also interest me less, hence which I participate the least. So what is he talking about?

Or what 'fairness' is AlphDoti talking about? It's the same thing that @urstill asked about. AlphDoti would rather put away what's 'unpleasant' for his convinience. He can even choose to ignore a question when it's only reasonable for him to answer.

Now he wants to play the same tactic on threads because he was protected yesterday. Or did he 'hijack' another thread for answering all unanswered questions from the past?

This unfair request by AlphDoti, Mcreggae and others can only be driven by ill will and hypocrisy and motives that only make this forum a nest of the mass man.