Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
The joy of knowing that I'm a Killer
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? A language that has a fitting description of it.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? A language that has a fitting description of it. I will leave you to it.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? Who is to name; who are 'we'? Who are you?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:kysse wrote:Muriel wrote:kysse wrote:Muriel wrote:If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.
My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him? because the person giving you the scales has issues with himself and wants to see himself through you.You are his mirror or some gauge for comparison. But why should you be the standard yet you have weaknesses like everybody else? Yes, Maybe he was rained on in the morning. lol. @ Muriel wacha uchokozi ,you are the rained on one. But isn't that how we all are? Evaluating others to discover ourselves? Others are our mirror. Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho. But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy. The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'. The 'kernel of philosophy' isn't in any book save the one you're writing. Otherwise, if it were about quoting others then the list will never end. Even Blavatsky quotes others. So it's better to quote yourself. Either you are personally interested in Cain or not. But I am comfortable having my 'self' who is also 'someone' on the scale and me outside doing the measuring. But when I say 'kernel of this philosophy' I am not talking about any other everyday ordinary philosophy like in 'kernel of philosophy'. I am talking about 'this' philosophy. 'This' philosophy is a specific philosophy. That is why I don't understand why you want to talk about Madam Blavatsky instead of 'the' philosophy she talks about. I am not interested in Madam Blavatsky 'her' self or 'my' self. 'The' philosophy has very direct bearing on Cain. That's why I have introduced it. Am not talking about Blavatsky, am talking about my Self. You can quote her if you like in your responses. As for me I am terribly engrossed by my thoughts. So don't make me start opening a book I have no interest in. And there's nothing like 'this philosophy'. I have even changed my definition of 'Philosophy'. So when you say 'this philosophy' I SMH. Ok, ok. I won't talk of her writing, at least directly. So lets go back to Cain.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? Who is to name; who are 'we'? Who are you? 'We' are the namers.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? A language that has a fitting description of it. I will leave you to it. At the appropriate time.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:kysse wrote:Muriel wrote:kysse wrote:Muriel wrote:If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.
My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him? because the person giving you the scales has issues with himself and wants to see himself through you.You are his mirror or some gauge for comparison. But why should you be the standard yet you have weaknesses like everybody else? Yes, Maybe he was rained on in the morning. lol. @ Muriel wacha uchokozi ,you are the rained on one. But isn't that how we all are? Evaluating others to discover ourselves? Others are our mirror. Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho. But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy. The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'. The 'kernel of philosophy' isn't in any book save the one you're writing. Otherwise, if it were about quoting others then the list will never end. Even Blavatsky quotes others. So it's better to quote yourself. Either you are personally interested in Cain or not. But I am comfortable having my 'self' who is also 'someone' on the scale and me outside doing the measuring. But when I say 'kernel of this philosophy' I am not talking about any other everyday ordinary philosophy like in 'kernel of philosophy'. I am talking about 'this' philosophy. 'This' philosophy is a specific philosophy. That is why I don't understand why you want to talk about Madam Blavatsky instead of 'the' philosophy she talks about. I am not interested in Madam Blavatsky 'her' self or 'my' self. 'The' philosophy has very direct bearing on Cain. That's why I have introduced it. Am not talking about Blavatsky, am talking about my Self. You can quote her if you like in your responses. As for me I am terribly engrossed by my thoughts. So don't make me start opening a book I have no interest in. And there's nothing like 'this philosophy'. I have even changed my definition of 'Philosophy'. So when you say 'this philosophy' I SMH. Ok, ok. I won't talk of her writing, at least directly. So lets go back to Cain. Yes. Cain.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? Who is to name; who are 'we'? Who are you? There is one truth you know irrespective of anything,you are.So be for He is and watch those questions fade before your eyes.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? Who is to name; who are 'we'? Who are you? There is one truth you know irrespective of anything,you are.So be for He is and watch those questions fade before your eyes. The questions fade because they end up being irrelevant. The 'single truth' is beyond thought and words. It's a balance of forces. Before you know it there's a resultant, and you are carried off. Words are late comers.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Muriel wrote:symbols wrote:If it's the unnameable I am happy. We name it first. You name it with what language? Who is to name; who are 'we'? Who are you? There is one truth you know irrespective of anything,you are.So be for He is and watch those questions fade before your eyes. The questions fade because they end up being irrelevant. The 'single truth' is beyond thought and words. It's a balance of forces. Before you know it there's a resultant, and you are carried off. Words are late comers.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
The joy of knowing that I'm a Killer
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|