If for business e.g deliveries,forget the two and get the AD Van ('DX' version of Wingroad) or the CK2A Lancer/Libero wagon (1994-1997,I think). If you get one (mitsubishi) powered by the 4G15 engine,the better.

Otherwise you can not compare the Mitsubishi Touring and the Wingroad. Moja ni maridadi,ingine ni ngari. The Cedia GDI Touring will be far ahead in terms of performance,miles further in terms of fuel use and reliability but for business forget it unless you will be driving it yourself everyday or you have a sensible driver. This I say because of the maintenace espacially shocks (there are no cheap Taiwanese parts for Mitsubishi so any replacement will be with genuine,which is inevitably EXPENSIVE for every make of car)

For fear of appearing prejudiced,I will not describe the Wingroad.

I made the assumption that the comparison was between the Wingroad and the CEDIA Touring Wagon because they share an era.

When you cannot make up your mind,just chose the one that pleases you and take good care of it.



Everyday!

@ Impunity please tell me why,is there a good reason? I think wingroad is dirt cheap to buy

Zama za Kengen IPO.... zama za mali

@ Impunity I am still lost. How does the ROI come in ? Suppose I sell booth cars few years later i.e. the wingroad for 240K and the Mits for 420K,which of the two has higher ROI and how is this measured ?


Zama za Kengen IPO.... zama za mali