Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
tycho wrote:AlphDoti wrote:tycho wrote:AlphDoti wrote:kysse wrote:complicated,even the names are complex. In this kind of discussion, you need to use logic. I realized I was so busy one year ago when this thread was being discussed. Who can we appoint as arbitrators, so that we can start reasoning around this area? We need three arbitrators, who will not be biased on this discussion, and will ensure all perticipating parties will adhere to honest and decent argument i.e. honesty say yes or no about a point. And ensure people reply to quesiton posed to them. Who can those three be? My first suggestion (1). @Wendz (2). ? (3). ? Why do we need arbitrators? ...will ensure all perticipating parties will adhere to honest and decent argument... ensure people reply to questions posed to them It's justmy suggestion, it's a sensitive topic, ad you've seen how others take it when it becomes so hot. It's not for the faint-hearted. I 'overstand'. Hahahaha. I wonder which 'goggles' I can propose. And by the way, some Wazuans have multiple handles. Like @Wendz may turn out to be @Hamburglar. Just the way I may be @Tokyo. Let's allow every handle to speak for itself. If it dodges a question well and good. If things go out of hand @admin can dump us all into the deep freezer. Hahahah... but this is good enough.
|