Muriel, you are thinking about 'future' and I'm speaking about 'Now'. There's no future to go to.

Perhaps an analogy can help. It's said that the universe has more disorder than order. In fact, all order moves to disorder, and is the 'product' of disorder. So disorder reigns, and moves to no future but is always 'Present'.

This is the description of the beginning, and is the end. Pure contradiction flowing freely on formlessness. Otherwise there'd be no 'eternity'.

The 'end to come in the future' can't be eternal. And we're talking about 'eternity' here.

Ok, I see,

But at some point past, the now - that is also called the present - was in the future. And it 'arrived'. Meaning it was 'went' to. Hence the future is to be 'gone' to. It, the future, will arrive.

Then, I think it was said wrong. The universe has more order than disorder, not the other way round.

Because the disorder means 'no-rules' hence implies subjection, adherence to the 'no-rules' rule.

If something were to happen to that rule, the 'no-rules' rule, say it was done away with, or amended or repealed then there would be no 'no-rules' rule and disorder would disappear because it cannot exist and subsist where there is anything other than 'no-rules' hence order would prevail. Order triumphs over disorder because disorder is playing by the rules of order.

Hence, progressing to perfection yet there is no future to go to is contradictory. The 'end to come in the future' is also contradictory in compliance to the earlier statement that 'everything is contradictory'.

Hence it is eternal. Implying future.

Only that ,,,,,

'Anti rule' obtains it's definition and it's existence from 'rule'. Hence it is dependent on 'rule'.

Without 'rule' there is no 'anti rule'. However, the converse might not be reality. 'Rule' can exist without 'anti rule'.

Hence 'anti rule' is finite while 'rule' is infinite.

Simon Makonde therefore becomes, for our purpose, the 'anti rule' while Monday, Tuesday etc becomes the 'rule'. They have been going on before, as and since Makonde died. They are 'eternity'.

Hence we can conclude there is a future, there is order, there is eternity, and ultimately, there will be no contradiction.

When I look into this matter, I realize that what happened to Wairimu and her husband was bound to happen, at least in one form or another.

Marriage can only be between an individual and God. Between two humans, God must not only be forgotten all together, but dehumanization must surely follow. Otherwise, how can pornography be a source of instruction and entertainment for us?

If one was to describe 'a happy marriage', what would he or she say it is? Praise and worship to the most high; and ultimate power and freedom for all? If it were this, then we wouldn't have the soaring cases of divorce and domestic violence. There has never been a happy 'human to human' marriage. Look at what @Mcreggae is saying about marriage; it's about two people and there's no manual. Doesn't that turn marriage into one very selfish and isolationist institution? Is this humanity? And happiness?

I now understand why Christ says that he's come to turn brother against brother, and to tear the family apart.

Mathew 10:35.

That's not a sweeping statement.

A 'happy marriage' is either about the two parties involved or about everyone. If it's about the former then it can't be communicated, or even observed by others. If the former, then heaven must have been established. And has it.

Matt 19:29 Shows a precondition for such a heavenly Kingdom.