Its nature.

True. The id is not in conflict. But it is the locus of conflict within and without the individual.

When I first wrote the above words I had a mind and metaphor that's different from the one I have now, and by the end of this post I'll be having another.

That's we have a set comprising of elements M, M1, M2, M3, . . . to infinity. The id then becomes the difference between M1, and M. And entails a demand for 'symbolic adaptation'.

That is, the Superego is 'expanding', and the ego, along with its symbols has to adjust. The compulsion to adjust is the id.

And it's Damocles sword because one dies if adjustment isn't made.

Being 'born again' is to come out of the system.

Indeed.

Is this the final product of 'hacking into your mind'?

Hahahaha! Do we have a new river to cross then? You sent me on an investigative journey. But I'm back now. Lol

Not 'back'. Wrong thinking. Hahahaha

The one never twiced crossed. When you hacked and unhacked those were two rivers you crossed alone.

So I decided to wake you up.

Why? Yes! When you first spoke, I was asleep, I woke a bit and read. Wanted to speak, but I was deep in a dream. So I went back to sleep.

But when I woke up it was gone. Or, am I in a sleep within sleep?

To speak to an other is to rouse for a joined sleeping. And dreaming.

And what would you say sleep is? The home of dreams? The worm in my belly is dreaming. And I am dreaming. Sleep within sleep.

Last paragraph? Knowledge is erotic. The mind, the bed.

Yes. Can it ever be otherwise? Indeed to perceive is to suffer.