wazua Tue, Dec 24, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

High Court orders Ariel adverts suspended
Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
Impunity
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:39:09 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,328
Location: Masada
Nonsense if u ask me
Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you

Rink.
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
butterflyke
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:46:48 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 3,024
Location: Hapa
at first when I read the heading of the article, thought it was about Airtel and the sms location tracker fiasco.....
Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. - Muhammad Ali🐝
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
webish
#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:49:29 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 671
Location: Nairobi
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?

Life is joy, death is peace, but the transition is very difficult.
Back to top
WWW
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Impunity
#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:58:46 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,328
Location: Masada
webish wrote:
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?


THIEVES!!!!!!
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Lolest!
#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:24:48 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
webish wrote:
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?

1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case.

2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!!

Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
mukiha
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:07:23 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 4,114
Lolest! wrote:
webish wrote:
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?

1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case.

2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!!



After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry!
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Impunity
#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:35:45 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,328
Location: Masada
mukiha wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
webish wrote:
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?

1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case.

2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!!



After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry!


In my house Ariel is king...I stopped buying OMO ages ago!
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
obiero
#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:12:59 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,517
Location: nairobi
Impunity wrote:
mukiha wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
webish wrote:
QUOTE:

"Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same.

Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products."
Really?

1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case.

2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!!



After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry!


In my house Ariel is king...I stopped buying OMO ages ago!

Ariel is better.. Soo true though, that MSK or Consumer Protection Society of Kenya, not certain of exact name, would be good intermediaries. The High Court is too high!

HF 90,000 ABP 3.83; KQ 414,100 ABP 7.92; MTN 23,800 ABP 6.45
Back to top
WWW
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Wazua Market Theme
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.