wazua Fri, May 8, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

57 Pages«<3132333435>»
Transfers...
Manyala
#321 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 7:10:19 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/8/2011
Posts: 482
Location: Nairobi
mkenyan wrote:
MADE wrote:
dossy7 wrote:
Ozil welcome to Arsenal and now let the league begin proper.

...at least Prof Wenger managed to pull a stunt of PR on impatient Arsenal fans. Ozil is good for the fans but not for the club. BTW, i foresee him being another Kaka or Kagawa for clash of position with the on form Carzola. They play same position. Any shift of position would herald a 'Rooney like' attitude when RVP was brought in.
All in all the EPL looks quite competitive this season. Fireworks ahead...

you realise that carzola plays both wings and centrally, has played wing for malaga, has played wing several several times for arsenal and doesn't play centrally all the time for arsenal. you may want to know what you are talking about before you share your armchair managerial abilities on the Internet.


@Mkenya, Kuwa mpole, when correcting somebody.
Jus Blazin
#322 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 7:29:55 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/23/2008
Posts: 3,966
TAZ wrote:
I hate to say this but after all this confusion inaonekana Fellaini was a "panic buy" especially when you consider the fact that you paid more than his original buy-out clause......good player though.

Sasa how would Fellaini have been a panic buy and yet United have been putting up bids for him for the better part of the transfer period?
Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
McReggae
#323 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 8:11:21 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Jus Blazin wrote:
TAZ wrote:
I hate to say this but after all this confusion inaonekana Fellaini was a "panic buy" especially when you consider the fact that you paid more than his original buy-out clause......good player though.

Sasa how would Fellaini have been a panic buy and yet United have been putting up bids for him for the better part of the transfer period?


Hata mimi @TAZ amenishangaza hapo, FellainI has always been on the radar....itwas just a matter of time.
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
nostoppingthis
#324 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 8:13:31 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 8/24/2009
Posts: 5,909
Location: Nairobi
McReggae wrote:
Jus Blazin wrote:
TAZ wrote:
I hate to say this but after all this confusion inaonekana Fellaini was a "panic buy" especially when you consider the fact that you paid more than his original buy-out clause......good player though.

Sasa how would Fellaini have been a panic buy and yet United have been putting up bids for him for the better part of the transfer period?


Hata mimi @TAZ amenishangaza hapo, FellainI has always been on the radar....itwas just a matter of time.


Why the inflated price?
smano
#325 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 10:41:42 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/13/2006
Posts: 2,589
@nostopping that"s what happens when you fail to trigger a release clause and then come back for the same player a few hours to deadline day
BEER IS LIVING PROOF THAT GOD LOVES US AND WANTS US TO BE HAPPY!
safariant
#326 Posted : Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:20:35 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/9/2010
Posts: 784
Location: ant hill - red hill
nostoppingthis wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Jus Blazin wrote:
TAZ wrote:
I hate to say this but after all this confusion inaonekana Fellaini was a "panic buy" especially when you consider the fact that you paid more than his original buy-out clause......good player though.

Sasa how would Fellaini have been a panic buy and yet United have been putting up bids for him for the better part of the transfer period?


Hata mimi @TAZ amenishangaza hapo, FellainI has always been on the radar....itwas just a matter of time.


Why the inflated price?


If he was planned they should have bought him before expiry of the clause.
The greatest act of bravery is chancing a fart while suffering from diarrhoea
MaichBlack
#327 Posted : Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:28:13 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,913
TAZ wrote:
Poleni Man Utd, Moyes signed Fellaini for £4m more than his expired buyout clause which expired in 31st July.....its like he had an agreement with Everton to rip off Man Utd once he becomes manager. Anyway Fellaini is still a good player.

I'm surprised on one has set the fact straight on this issue. Man United paid 23.5m for Fellaini. I repeat 23.5 - the exact amount that was stated in the expired release clause. Everton announced the deal as WORTH 27.5m to them because Fellaini waived the bonus that would have been due to him. This would have amounted to 4m!!! Habari ndiyo hio. Of course News outlets will continue to report the more "romantic" 27.5 but it would be nice for people to get the facts right.

Having said that, as I said earlier, the way Man United conducted business this window was TOTALLY AMATEURISH!!! At this rate, we might need a director of football!! Moyes might not take it kindly but the club is bigger than anyone and it is not there to massage anyone's ego!

Although this is taking to far, and has an extremely slim chance of ever happening, how about having Sir Alex as the first Director of Football? What?? Can't a brother dream?

And by the way, how have Arsenal fans survived for 8 years?? A month of comedy and a loss to Liverpool is TOO MUCH for any Man United fan to take. Arsenal have been living like this for 8 years!! Man, Arsenal fans must be strong. That or they went past their elastic limit long time ago!
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
King G
#328 Posted : Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:35:13 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/20/2012
Posts: 3,855
Location: Othumo
safariant wrote:
nostoppingthis wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Jus Blazin wrote:
TAZ wrote:
I hate to say this but after all this confusion inaonekana Fellaini was a "panic buy" especially when you consider the fact that you paid more than his original buy-out clause......good player though.

Sasa how would Fellaini have been a panic buy and yet United have been putting up bids for him for the better part of the transfer period?


Hata mimi @TAZ amenishangaza hapo, FellainI has always been on the radar....itwas just a matter of time.


Why the inflated price?


If he was planned they should have bought him before expiry of the clause.


The original plan which backfired was to get both Fellani and Bainesa at about 40m which would have been cheap. But then again, it has happened and now we wait for his performance.

He is very good during corners at both ends and he had 12 goals last season, 11 in EPL. That would be a plus.

Though i find him too rough for my liking. Time will tell.
Thieves
TAZ
#329 Posted : Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:35:42 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/14/2007
Posts: 4,152
@ Maich....Man Utd paid £27.5m for Fellaini, the 4m you are talking about was actually a creation of the media. Everton have already clarified the issue

"For those asking: No Felli did NOT pay £4m of the transfer fee! The buying club (Man Utd) will pay £27.5m." Everton's director of communications Alan Myers

http://www1.skysports.co...f-marouane-fellaini-fee

There are unconfirmed reports indicating that RVP is unhappy with Moyes.

http://metro.co.uk/2013/...oss-david-moyes-3949452/
King G
#330 Posted : Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:45:24 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/20/2012
Posts: 3,855
Location: Othumo
stolen#

Who cares how much Man Utd eventually spent on Falleini, so what if we overpaid by £4 million it would only end up lining the Glazer's pockets anyway.
Thieves
57 Pages«<3132333435>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.