So you, like a ruminant, regurgitate, nay, you plagiarize my autobiography and want to pass it off as your original thought?

You want to appear like your 'reasonable probability' is 'fairly' accurate?

If I was your professor, I would fail you thoroughly. And give you manual work to do. For being a disgrace to intelligence. To professors.

Because you have confirmed that your 'reasonable probability' is actually of the 'I-dont-know' type let alone the 'maybe' type.

That you have to wait till I put it for all to read then you pen a lengthy article in apparent 'well thought out postulation' all to just appear like you can make highly intelligent 'reasonable probability'.

I hope 'William' will pen an article in the Sunday Nation, as he always does, correcting the ills in English of plagiarism. Regurgitation. Copying. Cheating. Ignorance.

Donge?

And thank you for conceding once more. Though tactfully.

Straight or convoluted I accept all concessions.

Simple. Basic. Elementary. Ignorant. I-dont-know-until-you-tell.

William.

Hahaha!

I could be a Lutheran

I could be a Presbyterian

I could be a Baptist

I could be a Methodist

I could be a Lollard

I could be a Seventh-day Adventist

I could simply be a 'protestant'.

And for a thread meant to discuss 'African traditional religions and philosophy in a new world' surely discussing these 'Western philosophies' is a huge step in the right direction and will lead to greater illumination, enlightenment, grasp, understanding on the 'African traditional religions and philosophy' in a new world.

Surely this must be an unmistakable concession that 'Traditional' 'African Systems' are but vague terminologies, words, concepts, ideas, imaginations that has so far eluded definition, delineation, quantification, discussion, enlightenment, illumination. Even Tycho.

Donge?

You cant define them, so you cant discuss them.

This thread is still ABK!!!!!

Wacha otani bwana.

William. Philip. Whoever. Reader. Tycho.

Can you give, show, illustrate situations, events, hypotheses with 'certainty to a reasonable degree' of the role, part of 'African traditional religions and philosophies in a new world'.

That is why you started this thread, donge?

Did you know that some Church has their own version of the Ten Commandments?
And not only did they changed the fourth Commandment, which is why most Churches now worship on Sunday.
But they also deleted second Commandment that talks about idolatry.

You know why they deleted this, right?
To allow remove any conflict when they start idoltery later! Brilliant!

I'm would not be surprised to see in the near future, how a man abolishing all the Ten Commandments. And then they would not need salvation anymore.

Despite this, many of "them"
do not feel shame to tell us that their Church has authority to change law of God.
And they felt nothing when they changed Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday.
They feel nothing about being blasphemous. The literally make God obsolete by the following:

— Lucius Ferraris, in “Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica”, Volume V, article on “Papa, Article II”, titled “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility”, #30, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.

If it were possible
the Church will have no problem in changing any of the Ten Commandments to whatever they want.
And whenever they want and just insisting that they had the authority.

You know how they feel
and get upset and defend themselves saying that there's no idolatry in Church.