leona.... some are reasonable lakini 30k per month on clothes every single month? kwani where are they shopping? Unless she is looking at percentages.. if the court has a tendancy of allocating say 30% of what you demand,then it could make sense.

(if i look at it as if it was me in her shoes... then 100k is not enough... may be i would even ask for half his salo....hehehehe(kidding)......... if i look at it as if Shitanda was my husband/brother/dad.... well.....) bet it will depend on which angle you look from.
Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.

No wonder SHITanda doesn't want to give up his gas-guzzler.

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB

Whichever side you're a supporting,one thing should stand clear

1.THE KIDS ARE INNOCENT.

2. THEY SHOULD NOT SUFFER THE MOTHER'S LEG OPENING GYMNASTICS.

3. THE FATHER KNEW HE WAS CAPABLE OF MAKING A WOMAN PREGNANT.

4. Finally,THE KIDS ARE INNOCENT AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR AS THE MAN'S ABILITY,which is reflected in the lifestyles he offers the other kids with the official wife.

If the woman is gold-digging,poor him. He should have known better.
Again i repeat the kids are innocent. They did not choose to be sired by irresponsible,morally deficient parents.

Those kids deserve the same lifestyle as that of the official family.

But hold kidogo............ Kenyans are just a foolish or blind lot. What do we expect from a minister who cannot show stewardship over two sperms?
He should go home Ringera way.


Cool Bull

Ukimwaga maji ni lazima uipanguze

www.mjengakenya.blogspot.com

For those saying that its justified because he is an MP who earns 1m tax free,2 years down the line he will be out. what next?

Due to affirmative action,men should have the same responsibilities as women. She is working,so share the maintenance costs. they made the babies together,so why not?