Let men take responsibity for their children. That's why there is a children's court to take care of such IRRESPONSIBLE men!!!

I will praise thee,O Lord my God,with all my heart: And I will glorify thy name forever more. Psalms 86:12

God grants one what he prays for. This guy told us the other day that 1800cc cars are for boys. seem to have excess chums so God has surely created an opportunity for him to sambaza.

jk

Mother's demand!!

Medical cover - 60,000 per year

Education - 50,000 per child per term

Food - 20,000

Rent - 35,000

Clothing - 30,000

Water - 1,000

Electricity - 5,000

Househelp 4,000

Entertainment - 10,000

........MADNESS,kwani wat does she do for a living herself!!!!


The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is overestimated.

mc reggae

am not a lawyer but what the woman is demanding is not completely unreasonable considering the fact that soita earns over 1m per month as an mp and minister. don't forget he also has some other investments elsewhere. in other words,he's a rich dude who can afford with ease what the woman is demanding without causing a massive dent in his bank. also most court rulings reflect that kids living standards should be proportinal to the earnings of the accused party,in this case same standards like the minister's own kids from the legally married wife. that's why celebs like p diddy,nas and mick jagger pay millions every months for the up keep pf their enstranged spouses.


OnLy deaD FiSh gO WiTh tHe floW....!

What about single fathers? How come none ever file for child support,yet the mothers of the kids could be doing better than themselves?

All over the world,it is acknowledged that women are the societies’ main custodians of mankind’s reproductive role and they therefore bear the PRIMARY responsibility of safeguarding that role. Put crudely,the 70,000 eggs a woman is born with for her lifetime are hers – she determines who,where and when they get fertilized. Period. It’s her prerogative. And the greatest physical and emotional investment in a bringing up a baby is mainly made by a woman.
One would therefore expect that with so much at stake for the young woman,she should take even greater responsibility not to ‘download’ a tot unless 110% sure about a man. Yet judging by the sheer numbers of single and hitherto unmarried women flocking the corridors of the Children’s Courts one sees the terrible carelessness abandon with which and this responsibility – and of keeping legs closed - has been handled.

There was a time you would go to a party and find young girls drinking and having very liberal makudinyo. If you partook of these wet,juicy low-hanging fruits that was one of these women and proceeded to jointly engage with her in advanced,naked or semi-naked horizontal physical exercises,then chances were good she would a couple of years down the line be the one suing you for Child support – yet it was a one night stand between 2 folks in various stages of drunkardness and in steamy,hazy room. Heck,none of you even remembered how it exactly happened. This made the fairer lasses complacent,throwing to the wind all caution in the happy knowledge that ever smirking AG and the Judiciary would gallop to their rescue in shining armor on a horse christened the Children’s Act. A cowardly judiciary keen on side-stepping - rather than risk drawing - the wrath of women rights’ groups would quickly seal your fate,slapping you with a maintenance order a mile long and including funny allowances like ‘ toys allowance,’ ‘holidays allowance - for someone whose idea of holiday starts and ends with Nairobi and her ushagoz.

Luckily the courts styled up and stopped pandering (not fully though) to the whims of the feminist gallery,after it was realized the Act had been commercialized and in some cases was being used to settle scores with their erstwhile male lovers after falling out (esp when the dude wants to marry someone else).

We have since heard of cases where mothers have even been denied custody. Actually in 2006 the courts rejected in toto attempts by partisan groups to sneak in a poorly disguised Affiliation Act through the backdoor using as pawns an innocent 6-year old kid and hiding behind fancy Western and NGO-inspired clichés like ‘’domesticating international conventions’.

Parents - raising kids is a lifetime commitment and dedication to invest in their physical,emotional & spiritual growth. This should not be relegated to the back burner in favor of monetary issues ala Shitanda’s where-have-you-been-till-now girlfriend.




..there's nothing,absolutely nothing really,that I can't do if I put my mind to it.