wazua Thu, Mar 19, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

4 Pages<1234>
MPESA Vs Call centre staff..
Impunity
#11 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:32:29 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,331
Location: Masada
jguru wrote:
They should join an union. Will give HRs of these Big Companies nightmares...


...an union...?

Ilikuya na meli kwere....hahahahaaa.
Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

King G
#12 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:37:02 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/20/2012
Posts: 3,855
Location: Othumo
Impunity wrote:
jguru wrote:
They should join an union. Will give HRs of these Big Companies nightmares...


...an union...?

Ilikuya na meli kwere....hahahahaaa.
Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly


bigger than Atwoli's Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
Thieves
washiku
#13 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:49:39 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
chemos wrote:
Muheani wrote:
King G wrote:
Am in consultancy in HRM and i dont see anything Safcom is doing wrong except for the 6 months rolling contracts.

Let them accept the employment terms and continue working or get another job and move on. Alai can also go to SC on their behalf.


Ditto!!!

The law on Contractual employment is very clear.
The rolling contracts..thats a pain...but again...not really illegal.


I guess...we should be very careful not to screem on top of our voices on the side of the employees..

Did you see anywhere the said "victims" (those laid off) have said they were infact kept on safcoms payroll, none for less than an yr, and most for longer than 1.3 yrs...

....with full salary and medical cover while the company was waiting for them to either recover or get other non headsets using positions internally?

Iam privy to that information.

Truth be told, if for any reason you are not able to meet terms of your explained and signed contract...then renegotiation or termination of contract follows.

However, you can only say may b some more gratuity on "human" and not medical or legal reason could have surficed.

The onus is on the said laid off staff to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the ENT conditions they experienced were primarily and only as a result of their employment.







Are u Nzioka Waita??d'oh! d'oh!


Or Ogutu hehehehehe
Muheani
#14 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:05:55 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 11/20/2009
Posts: 1,402
washiku wrote:
chemos wrote:
Muheani wrote:
King G wrote:
Am in consultancy in HRM and i dont see anything Safcom is doing wrong except for the 6 months rolling contracts.

Let them accept the employment terms and continue working or get another job and move on. Alai can also go to SC on their behalf.


Ditto!!!

The law on Contractual employment is very clear.
The rolling contracts..thats a pain...but again...not really illegal.


I guess...we should be very careful not to screem on top of our voices on the side of the employees..

Did you see anywhere the said "victims" (those laid off) have said they were infact kept on safcoms payroll, none for less than an yr, and most for longer than 1.3 yrs...

....with full salary and medical cover while the company was waiting for them to either recover or get other non headsets using positions internally?

Iam privy to that information.

Truth be told, if for any reason you are not able to meet terms of your explained and signed contract...then renegotiation or termination of contract follows.

However, you can only say may b some more gratuity on "human" and not medical or legal reason could have surficed.

The onus is on the said laid off staff to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the ENT conditions they experienced were primarily and only as a result of their employment.







Are u Nzioka Waita??d'oh! d'oh!


Or Ogutu hehehehehe



Eh?, smile ... nope, aca, hapana.
jguru
#15 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:09:45 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 1,574
King G wrote:
Impunity wrote:
jguru wrote:
They should join an union. Will give HRs of these Big Companies nightmares...


...an union...?

Ilikuya na meli kwere....hahahahaaa.
Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly


bigger than Atwoli's Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4vf8N6GpdM
Set out to correct the world's wrongs and you will most certainly wind up adding to them.
maka
#16 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:13:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
chemos wrote:
Muheani wrote:
King G wrote:
Am in consultancy in HRM and i dont see anything Safcom is doing wrong except for the 6 months rolling contracts.

Let them accept the employment terms and continue working or get another job and move on. Alai can also go to SC on their behalf.


Ditto!!!

The law on Contractual employment is very clear.
The rolling contracts..thats a pain...but again...not really illegal.


I guess...we should be very careful not to screem on top of our voices on the side of the employees..

Did you see anywhere the said "victims" (those laid off) have said they were infact kept on safcoms payroll, none for less than an yr, and most for longer than 1.3 yrs...

....with full salary and medical cover while the company was waiting for them to either recover or get other non headsets using positions internally?

Iam privy to that information.

Truth be told, if for any reason you are not able to meet terms of your explained and signed contract...then renegotiation or termination of contract follows.

However, you can only say may b some more gratuity on "human" and not medical or legal reason could have surficed.

The onus is on the said laid off staff to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the ENT conditions they experienced were primarily and only as a result of their employment.







Are u Nzioka Waita??d'oh! d'oh!

I actually wanted to say that @muheani should answer on Bob's behalf well done no case here...
possunt quia posse videntur
accelriskconsult
#17 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:32:35 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 4/2/2011
Posts: 629
Location: Nai
Josey wrote:
If this is true about MPESA Ltd. Then ninaomba serkali... ya digital isa idie...
safariCon



What is the objective of Alai publishing this letter?

I do not think that it contains any illegality. Kama ni propaganda ya competitors Alai aseme
maka
#18 Posted : Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:18:10 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
accelriskconsult wrote:
Josey wrote:
If this is true about MPESA Ltd. Then ninaomba serkali... ya digital isa idie...
safariCon



What is the objective of Alai publishing this letter?

I do not think that it contains any illegality. Kama ni propaganda ya competitors Alai aseme

It may have been in good faith but the approach is wrong,among the telecos scom still pays its employees really well and treats them nicely,they have a sense of belonging etc etc cutting costs is there and real all.over the world...
possunt quia posse videntur
Mastermind
#19 Posted : Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:06:04 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 1/25/2012
Posts: 1,624
Location: Langley
Safaricom sues SHITTY blogger Alai for libel
http://www.nation.co.ke/...80/-/f2f5k6/-/index.html
If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them.
symbols
#20 Posted : Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:24:18 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/19/2013
Posts: 2,552
[quote=Mastermind]Safaricom sues SHITTY blogger Alai for libel
http://www.nation.co.ke/...0/-/f2f5k6/-/index.html[/quote]

The hits his site will get,lol.That move will haunt them later on because now he's got the attention of more people.
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.