Thanks for indulging me @tycho. You have two facets it appears, writing-wise that is, you can be very clear when you want to, also very obtuse, as the straight post above proves. I get what you are putting across, I have objections here and there.
Never said I didnt trust you. I also never said I trusted you. I said I thought you were having a laugh, significant difference, like a satirist you might say. That is to be skeptical.
To say I trust or don't trust you is heavy handed and presumptous on your part. The adjective 'trust' or 'distrust' is too heavy for the near-anonymous interactions we carry out on the web. You cannot take such a liberty with someone you do not know personally. To proceed from this point on to calling me insecure is egregious. ...why, because I took a shot at your poetry? Does anyone who criticises your writing or indeed you become insecure? Have you noticed I generally leave your normal political commentary (the non poetic ones) alone? You were doing fine until you set upon this blurry trust/insecurity path.

So @tycho, are you free from all distrust, or any kind of distrust? Because no normal human is completely free from some form of distrust, no matter how small. To claim otherwise is to imply perfection on your part. Or may I ask how much mistrust is considered enough to cross the threshold into the insecure? Who decides this threshold? You? You judged me, its a fair question.
How about security agents, like NSIS, they tend to distrust a lot of things and a lot of people, are they insecure too? If you are not claiming perfection, wouldn't that put you in that huge bin of distrustful, insecure people you mentioned up there? So I am baffled, what or who gives you the right to say I am insecure?
Sweeping statements like these are careless; for instance #7 here.


..you are pointing at an entire class of people and passing judgment on them. when people pass judgment on others, they are saying they are not encumbered with the same short comings as those they judge. You took one brush, dipped it in a mud called insecurity and inferiority complex and blanketly painted the middle class. No variance or deviation can exist, right? you have perfect knowledge. Wow, talk of impertinence.
Even claiming this was made as social commentary cant save it from the eddies of arrogance which are steering it towards the rocks; It is acceptable to point out and mock human folly, but it is another thing to consign people as beleaguered by it cause they belong to a certain economic station. So, only the middle class is saddled with this distrust problem right? The higher class trust their own, trust the middle and the lower as well, and the lower do the same for the middle and higher classes? Much love from up and below then, with only the middle being the suspicious and pouty black sheep, that is what you would have us believe? The higher classes cannot be insecure? How about the lower classes? All of the higher classes or just some? As a matter of fact, who are these people who cannot and are not insecure and how did they get that way?

Can insecurity be attributed to fear, or actually be a form of it? Cause earlier you made these mind bending statements

then this. .


Do these two statements portend good or bad things? Also, are you exempt from them? I am freshly confused. ..

My parting words, temper your generalizations, or avoid them altogether; Averages or prevalent behaviour may tend towards the majority, but they are not absolutes, not 100%.

Then you have not expressed exhaustively what your understanding of 'middle class' is. Common knowledge defines middle class along the lines of..
In that same boat I might also add 'mistrust' and 'insecure' as well ..I seem to have a different understanding than yours.
Remember, you modified the post to my preference, so I assumed that you wrote in straight prose, leaving not much room for multiple or layered interpretation. I interpreted the words pretty much as any standard English dictionary would have me interpret them. Against this background, you can see my confusion. But I await your explanation.

Informational power of wazua?Action driven clicks fueled by intent to influence decision making in the lives of Wazuans.People want to make a difference when they want to forget they already are.

Information,relativity and truth.

If truth is absolute only, how is communication possible?

I think you looked at the negative aspect of all. So what if you looked at it innocently and without reading mischief?

Look at it from Mahatma Ghandi 's view as he had all these attributes.

e.g. Knowledge could be just simply be knowledge that makes it easier for you to accomplish tasks and not gullible.

I'm one of those people who still believes in the goodness in humanity.

Can a symbol have absolute meaning only? If that were so, no one would speak.

Why would people need to communicate under certainty?

Therefore symbols imply uncertainty, and communication is the search for certainty.