wazua Sat, May 2, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

2 Pages12>
Quandary - pls help
Djinn
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:02:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 1,565
A friend wished to lease a 5 bed room house and while the house had been previously occupied,it was not finished to normal standards. So he agreed to pay a deposit on the understanding that some painting,burglar proofing and other works would be done within a month to allow him to occupy the property. One month later,the work had not started - so he met the landlord and allowed 2 more weeks and still the work had not started. So he broke the agreement and wants his money back. its now 2 months later and he still cannot get his deposit back...should he:

1 - Report to the police that he has been conned (i.e. landlord obtained money by false pretences - supposed landlord has demonstrated he did not intend to repair the house or make it habitable despite being allowed time by the future tenant)
2 - Court?

Your thoughts and experiences appreciated.




The problem with equality is that we desire that it be with those that have more than us rather that those that have less
Kaigangio
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:10:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/27/2007
Posts: 2,768
@ djinn,

had your friend and the landlord entered into a kind of a written agreement or was a receipt issued when the deposit was paid???


NEVER TALK OF A RHINO IF THERE IS NO TREE NEAREBY - ZULU PROVERB
...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
Djinn
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:13:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 1,565
since occupation was to be a month later,the landlord prepared a letter of offer kidn of thing - not really outlining tenancy issues - just that the property was available to let. they exchanged ID copies,signed and each has a copy of the letter of offer - a receipt was also issued but receipt is in an agents name - not the landlord's name

The problem with equality is that we desire that it be with those that have more than us rather that those that have less
McReggae
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:16:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Vijana wako ready,kibich awatafute na kazi itafanywa na deposit atapata!!!!!

The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is overestimated.
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
nanfor
#5 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:18:00 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/6/2009
Posts: 172
Djinn

Your friend saw a house. He paid for a house that existed. that is not false pretense.

To make things worse for him,there is no false pretense in situations of future events. Otherwise all lawyers will be in jail...Not a bad idea.

Do not listen to a lawyer or a cop who tells you there is false pretence there. There was a house to rent. The owner wanted to rent him the house. It was your friend who decided that he did not want it.....because it was not painted.

he can sue for breach of contract. He has to prove that there was actually a contract and the extent of the contract. After all the landlord may say that your friend wanted a jacuzzi in the house.

He either takes him to small claims court or leaves it as is.....Oh there are no small claims courts in Kenya.
McReggae
#6 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:48:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
It seems your friend has no chance of a case in the eyes of the kenyan 'law'.....the law of the jungle is the only way here or......he gives up his cash!!!!!!

The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is overestimated.
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
Kaigangio
#7 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:03:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/27/2007
Posts: 2,768
@ djinn,

your friend paid the deposit to an agent and not the landlord...so any issues to do with money,he would have to get the agents,not the landlord

as for the repairs and additionals,your friend entered into a verbal agreement (which is not binding) with the landlord who is not tied by any tenancy-landlord agreements...the letter of offer here is meaningless as it does not constitute an agreement...

so in this case i see two scenarios.....

firstly,your friend is offered a house,pays a deposit for it and agrees to occupy it a month later but does not occupy it...he is theoretically already in rent arrears in as far as the landlord is concerned...the landlord has the right to sue him for this.

your friend is not due for any refund in as far as the agent (receipt issuer) is concerned because this deposit is meant to offset the cost of minor repairs in the rental when the tenant is moving out and the defaulted rent....so the agent can also sue him for rent default....

either way your friend is not safe unless of course he is dealing with an 'understanding' landlord......


NEVER TALK OF A RHINO IF THERE IS NO TREE NEAREBY - ZULU PROVERB
...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
Djinn
#8 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:51:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 1,565
@kaigangio - the rent was paid to the landlord - handed into his palms. The failure to occupy was owing to the inhabitable state (no paint,no burglar proffing),even after 6 weeks had elapsed. The false pretences I think is given after 6 weeks,the landlord still had not fixed it - and even to date it would appear has not.

The problem with equality is that we desire that it be with those that have more than us rather that those that have less
Kusadikika
#9 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:06:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2008
Posts: 2,723
Djinn,
Your friend has been screwed and there is no way under the law he can get his money back. He paid the deposit and 6 weeks down the line he had not occupied the house. Here is the biggest problem. The agent can produce the receipt and acknowledge that he received the money but then he can claim that your friend entered and occupied the house immediately after paying. What proof does your friend have that he did not occupy the house?? Hapo ndiyo shida iko. Like Kaigangio has pointed out below if push comes to shove,the landlord can sue your friend for rent arrears and if he is nasty can even sue for damage to the property. It is in situations like this that,however hard and humiliating it is,the wise thing is to walk away or ask the landlord to hurumia you na akurudishie kidogo tu from his 'kind' heart angalao ya fare.

Weusi wa nywele za mshtakiwa zaonyesha ujinga alio nao
Djinn
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:20:00 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 1,565
@kusadikika - you are firing while half cocked - which part of 'letter of offer' do you not understand. Its not a lease. And the letter of offer gives the proposed date of occupation which is 4 weeks from the date of the offer. So in the absence of a lease...

The problem with equality is that we desire that it be with those that have more than us rather that those that have less
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.