@Wakanyugi, lets think about Einstein's statement on time.

Time exists to prevent uncontrollable events.

That is, time is a control mechanism, in a system with many events.

And if time is a control, then it is a force. Hence energy.

You have done well to mention biological functions, do they exist?

They definitely exist. That is why even though conceptually we do not believe in Gravity, we wouldn't dare to throw ourselves over a cliff.

I don't know, have you practiced meditation by 'following the breath'? In it you let the body breath on its own volition. This breath is timed. In this state of being, one can feel the inner organs moving at the same rate.

If you haven't had this experience, then you'd definitely have a hard time knowing how the body deals with time.

And let me ask, why should the body deal with spatial control and fail to deal with time?

Consider this: If time doesn't exist, then there can be no relativity.

So I ask myself, why would a person construct an argument on premises that don't exist to prove that something else doesn't exist?

Surely, this has been the predicament of Man for so long!

Religion without science, is falsehood, and neither is the converse true!

We have been living under false premises. We are living in a false city. Babylon.

Let Man God, set it ablaze!

Sorry to barge in...Exactly what is revolutionary here?
Scholars have known about the apotheosis of man for eons. Even the creationist admit God made man in his own image and gave him dominion over earth..so basically a co creator with him aka 'mangod'
And what is this nobility, who are its leaders

I don't think I need to say more.

nobility implies that there are others who are serfs, nobility is is for the few. We cant all be kings.Even in Gods kingdom there is hierarchy.
I never claimed to be a mangod, you did. God is ultimately the ulitimate. we can be like him ..its an evolutionary process..but we cannnot be him at the same time and be man. His spirit can dwell in us as but we cannot be man and God at the same time . it has been tried many times since babel

May i propose the following thought experiment before we ridicule scientist, the best including Einstein, Neils Bohr, Newton, Kopler have some interesting positions on reality, God, light e.t.c, they are not enemies of religion.
1. Shroedingers Cat

Please also study Einsteins exchange with Niels Bohr about "God does not play dice"..google it.. at the 1927 Solvay conference where many of the scientific dimensions of philosophy have remained to date.

I will then lead you to a video from a foremost scientist who can explain how you can be anyone, anywhere, at anytime, dead or alive, if you like "a scientific connection to God" then perhaps pursue your enlightenment from a more friendly stance to conventional science rather than pseudoscience.

Note, God is truth, so do not fear truth, science is the best truth we have so far, my best perception of God is "I AM WHO I AM", so putting God "in a box" whether a particular religion, or your own world view is neither here nor there, God and religion are two different things. Baruch Spinoza, an excellent philosopher on Ethics and spirituality is another good one to study.

@Much Know, I am conversant with the references you have given. And even, I have great regard for the people you have mentioned, what your argument really is.

You say Science can connect Man to God, from an apparatus in some Lab. Where there's 'Conventional' science.

Then in the same breath you imply that religion is about God.

But then you say religion and science are at variance. Is that in order?

You have put your case as if we are now disregarding the great scientists. But this is far from true!

This is not about science per se, it is about Man being conscious of his identity with God even outside the lab. And still have an integrated life.

How will you justify the possibility of people being internally divided?

If there's no integration, how will we protect the 'I'.

If you understand the case of Schroedinger's cat, why do you look at the history and evolution of science so casually?

Please remember that we can only have a Grand Unifying Theory, if we integrate Man!

Hahaha....to prove time doesn't exist is to prove yourself wrong.Interesting,a self defeating argument.

What do we have beyond space?What exist out of space?

Dear Tycho,

I suggest we move on to other questions. It seems we are in parallel Universes.

Here is what I said:

Time is not real; does not exist. Therefore space does not exist. Therefore the Universe does not exist. Therefore relativity does not exist. Therefore YOU don't exist.

In other words - the above have no reality except that which (observer) gives them. They are all illusions.

The only thing that exists is 'UNITY' - call it a singularity if you like. Einstein and others called it 'Observer.'

Here is what I DID NOT say:

I make no value judgement on our creations. We have created illusions and called them time, space, Tycho, Chessmaster...etc, etc. This does not mean they are meaningless or wrong or of less value. In UNITY there is nothing to contrast them with anyway.

But they are still illusions, which we create for very specific purposes.

For time, in my opinion, the most important purpose of this illusion is to help us operate in a 'strange' 4 dimensional reality. One that is not innate to our/my/your nature at all.

And NOW, I REST my case.