Landing was always on his mind.Btw do you know he was the uncle of the father of P.R,Edward Barneys who actually used Freud's theories in an exceptional way.

But I think some of his theories were sound but interpreted wrongly even though he put it wrongly. For example,Oedipus complex.In my view,people will either date someone like their mother figure or the opposite the mother figure. What do you think?

weee chessman, usianze kuniuliza maswali ngumu nikiwa hungover namna this. Labda ubonge kuhusu philosophy ya ma tusker na kwanini wanaume wanajiumizaga na hangi.

Landing is a very serious matter.

I think it does but I have no clue what it is.

@josiah33 - I think we are in agreement. Because what you've said is how I'm thinking about it. Now let me ask you a question,if time doesn't exist,define beginning.

What is ultimate being if not God?

Yes. God, is ultimate being.

The question you have asked uses 'time' in two ways at the same time.

First you use it as a concept, and you finish by using it as an essence.

Therefore you cannot get a 'true' answer.

But time and eternity are compatible. And there's neither beginning or ending, in essence.

Try and figure out what this mean, maybe there's some clue there-


I am having a headache just trying to understand what that means.

Your question again falls into the above trap.

And thinking about it, it was the same trap that led to the 'Tychonic system' which was Tycho Brahe's attempt to reconcile religion and science in the early days of the Scientific revolution.

He was sure that Man was 'the' center of the universe, but natural science, had shown that the earth wasn't the center of the universe, even in terms of 'attention'.

Tycho had to cling on the idea that the sun and moon moved around the earth, while the other planets revolved around the sun.

But now we can modify the Tychonic system as:

Man, is the Unifier of the perception to ultimate being, and is thus, at 'the' center of the universe.