wazua Sun, Feb 2, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

11 Pages«<34567>»
philosophy
ChessMaster
#81 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:02:20 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
tycho
#82 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:13:34 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.
ChessMaster
#83 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:19:27 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.


Then how would you define the concept of preparation.
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
tycho
#84 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:35:47 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.


Then how would you define the concept of preparation.


Motion intended to cause further motion.
ChessMaster
#85 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:42:41 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.


Then how would you define the concept of preparation.


Motion intended to cause further motion.


Relative to the destination,this motion can be said to be at rest.
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
ChessMaster
#86 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:36:27 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
Prisoner's_dilemma Link

I feel like playing game theory. Game theory in relationships and cheating.Game theory in politics.How do we draft it
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
tycho
#87 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:59:35 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.


Then how would you define the concept of preparation.


Motion intended to cause further motion.


Relative to the destination,this motion can be said to be at rest.


The only state that is in relative rest is in the future. The motion that is yet to be effected.
ChessMaster
#88 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:07:04 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
tycho wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:
@tycho - Where do you prepare,while in motion or before?
@Impunity - Yes.It will remove you.Its a case of 'ready or not...'


Relative motion, or relative rest; all of them entail motion.

Preparation means pre-energic state. Such a state doesn't exist.


Then how would you define the concept of preparation.


Motion intended to cause further motion.


Relative to the destination,this motion can be said to be at rest.


The only state that is in relative rest is in the future. The motion that is yet to be effected.


I think we are in agreement. Now I understand your position
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
Wakanyugi
#89 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:10:01 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634
Yes, @Wakanyugi. But then I believe such an approach could lead to what is 'what?'

Anyway, I share your concern.



I agree.

So I suggest we would be better of discussing psychology rather than philosophy.

I'll start.

Your nom de plume 'Tycho' based as it is on two literary/scientific events (one real and one fiction) reveals more about you than it hides.

Kweri rongo?





"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
Wakanyugi
#90 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:15:42 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634
ChessMaster wrote:


@Wakanyugi - Language is tool of communication. Doing is a role being plays. Question number three is what philosophy is about.


Really?

So do animals and trees and some machines have language? It is a proven fact they communicate.

And what exactly does 'being' 'do'?

Does a tree 'be?
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
ChessMaster
#91 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:25:19 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
Wakanyugi wrote:
ChessMaster wrote:


@Wakanyugi - Language is tool of communication. Doing is a role being plays. Question number three is what philosophy is about.


Really?

So do animals and trees and some machines have language? It is a proven fact they communicate.

And what exactly does 'being' 'do'?

Does a tree 'be?


There are many types of languages.Body language,sign language,words...these are different types languages which are used to communicate. Animals have their languages.Trees I doubt.Machines,especially computers have propagated the most ubiquitous language man has ever seen,binary.

To do something you have to be something.Doing is something a 'being' does. Basically to do something you have to be something,which in this case I call being otherwise if you are nothing you can't do anything.Now I don't know if a tree is a 'being'.
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
ChessMaster
#92 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:29:25 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
Wakanyugi wrote:
Yes, @Wakanyugi. But then I believe such an approach could lead to what is 'what?'

Anyway, I share your concern.



I agree.

So I suggest we would be better of discussing psychology rather than philosophy.

I'll start.

Your nom de plume 'Tycho' based as it is on two literary/scientific events (one real and one fiction) reveals more about you than it hides.

Kweri rongo?



This one I have to intrude.Psychology is the philosophy of mind and self. If you are talking about user names,I like that too.I have also been thinking on what user names say about the users.
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
Wakanyugi
#93 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:30:54 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634

The only state that is in relative rest is in the future. The motion that is yet to be effected.


When I was away, it seems the debate moved from philosophy to celestial mechanics.

Motion implies space and time.

Are you trying to tell us that space and time are real?

Prove it!
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
tycho
#94 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:32:27 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Wakanyugi wrote:
Yes, @Wakanyugi. But then I believe such an approach could lead to what is 'what?'

Anyway, I share your concern.



I agree.

So I suggest we would be better of discussing psychology rather than philosophy.

I'll start.

Your nom de plume 'Tycho' based as it is on two literary/scientific events (one real and one fiction) reveals more about you than it hides.

Kweri rongo?



Which scientific/literary events?

Wakanyugi
#95 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:35:27 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634
"There are many types of languages.Body language,sign language,words...these are different types languages which are used to communicate. Animals have their languages.Trees I doubt.Machines,especially computers have propagated the most ubiquitous language man has ever seen,binary."

So man made machines have language but trees, the complex entities they are, do not? How human!


"Now I don't know if a tree is a 'being'."

So who decides if an entity is a being or not? The one being or the one perceiving?

Which of these points of view is 'truth?'
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
tycho
#96 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:35:47 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Wakanyugi wrote:

The only state that is in relative rest is in the future. The motion that is yet to be effected.


When I was away, it seems the debate moved from philosophy to celestial mechanics.

Motion implies space and time.

Are you trying to tell us that space and time are real?

Prove it!


Can I be allowed to do this in a different thread? I intend to start one on 'Post Modern Cosmology' maybe tomorrow?
Wakanyugi
#97 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:40:48 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634
"This one I have to intrude.Psychology is the philosophy of mind and self. If you are talking about user names,I like that too.I have also been thinking on what user names say about the users."

Just a minute Chess master.

How can you speak of mind and self before you define them?

What animals are these that you are introducing to the debate?
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
ChessMaster
#98 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:41:43 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
Wakanyugi wrote:
"There are many types of languages.Body language,sign language,words...these are different types languages which are used to communicate. Animals have their languages.Trees I doubt.Machines,especially computers have propagated the most ubiquitous language man has ever seen,binary."

So man made machines have language but trees, the complex entities they are, do not? How human!


"Now I don't know if a tree is a 'being'."

So who decides if an entity is a being or not? The one being or the one perceiving?

Which of these points of view is 'truth?'


You can't perceive if you are not a being. Who decides,ultimately the creator if you believe in one. But me a being is conscious life.What do you think?
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
ChessMaster
#99 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:47:35 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/23/2009
Posts: 1,626
Wakanyugi wrote:
"This one I have to intrude.Psychology is the philosophy of mind and self. If you are talking about user names,I like that too.I have also been thinking on what user names say about the users."

Just a minute Chess master.

How can you speak of mind and self before you define them?

What animals are these that you are introducing to the debate?


Exactly.And thats what psychology is trying to decipher.Who is the self and what exactly is the mind. Like I quoted earlier,you can doubt everything in this world but you can't doubt your 'self'.You are you.You are alive or experiencing life.
Uncertainty is certain.Let go
Wakanyugi
#100 Posted : Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:47:40 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,634
"You can't perceive if you are not a being. Who decides,ultimately the creator if you believe in one. But me a being is conscious life.What do you think?"

To perceive, two beings have to communicate, I assume (could be wrong).

So trees are beings then.

But this raises another question.

There are many entities we do not really understand? Does that mean they are not 'beings?'

I was born on the slopes of a mountain and for many years I could swear the mountain called to me - still does. I know people who swear the sea, their country etc calls to them.

Are all these 'beings?'
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (6)
11 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.