tycho wrote:Mchanganuzi wrote:tycho wrote:Some people have attained first class achievement by sacrificing other aspects of their lives.
But still, one can attain first class achievements and lead a first class life.
It all depends on how things work around you. For example, some people think that work and play, or study and play are mutually exclusive. I think, and I've grown knowing that they are one thing.
Being first class doesn't require a struggle; it must be 'effortless' and enjoyable.
And that's why i realized it could have not been for me when i sat for my first CAT and left it to the owners.
So, do we now say that success' replication out of class for them depends on whether how they attained it; naturally or through a lot of sacrifice. I think am now getting to understand them better.
Social skills, tolerance, and perseverance in adversity and other skills needed for a successful life need to be cultivated and enjoyed.But if you get your first class hons. and expect to be employed and taken care of, then you'll find life very difficult.
Imagine getting a first class in economics, and from Havard, only to be told
economics is a pseudo science and unneeded? What do you do?
I agree that success in life depends on our ability to develop those skills. Can someone pliz explain this to them and they will be good people to work and live with.
You also brought about another subject of interest that; Economics is a pseudo science. Is that why these guys rarely agree on issues? At least my signature claims so.
Second, i think economics is a very interesting subject; a way of thinking rather than a set of skills which makes those who are excellent at it seem to be difficult characters to understand. Look at them beginning with our good..... MK. They have a lot different way of looking at things from the rest of us.
Any Economists in the House. Is it true? What do you have to say about this? Defend your subject and character or confirm these allegations.