wazua Fri, Apr 3, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

16 Pages«<56789>»
NIC 1:4 rights issue - sh21 per share
VituVingiSana
#61 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:37:25 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
mkonomtupu wrote:
NIC Bank’s rights issue has been oversubscribed by 238 per cent, managing to attract Sh7 billion in offers against the Sh2 billion it had sought.
http://www.businessdaily.../-/qpl8c4z/-/index.html

Good news I wish they had supplied more shares
I wonder how large the Ndegwas' application was beyond the 25%? I am sure it was over-subscribed even without the Ndegwas applying for additional shares.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
gesowan
#62 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:22:24 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/6/2010
Posts: 289
Does anyone know the formula to allocate the said shares????????????
mlennyma
#63 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:51:40 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/21/2010
Posts: 6,194
Location: nairobi
I knew and didnt bother applying additional shares,refunds ghost after tying money
"Don't let the fear of losing be greater than the excitement of winning."
VituVingiSana
#64 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:28:09 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
The allocation has not been announced. I figure it will be in the newspapers tomorrow. I wonder if the Ndegwas used their clout to get 35%. I think the Ndegwas called Ndungu who called Githae who told Muthuara that let the brothers increase it to 35%. It's all in-house. Tuko Pamoja.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
cnn
#65 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:35:51 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 6/17/2009
Posts: 1,627
12.7 million shares out the 98.7 million allocated were not taken,this will form the pool for those who applied for more shares.To be fair to all shareholders the allocation criteria for such, should always be in the IM.
VituVingiSana
#66 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:37:40 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
cnn wrote:
12.7 million shares out the 98.7 million allocated were not taken,this will form the pool for those who applied for more shares.To be fair to all shareholders the allocation criteria for such, should always be in the IM.
It was not specified clearly in the IM. I read it multiple times & it was vague but the ultimate authority was given to the Board of Directors... most of whom are appointees, related or connected to the Ndegwas...
*BTW, where did you get the allocation info/criteria & that 12.7mn were untaken? I just checked the NSE website but nothing is on there*
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
mlennyma
#67 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:40:30 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/21/2010
Posts: 6,194
Location: nairobi
http://af.reuters.com/ar...ws/idAFL6E8LA5JY20121010
"Don't let the fear of losing be greater than the excitement of winning."
Gordon Gekko
#68 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:15:05 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
cnn wrote:
12.7 million shares out the 98.7 million allocated were not taken,this will form the pool for those who applied for more shares.To be fair to all shareholders the allocation criteria for such, should always be in the IM.


I think SCB set the precedent in their previous rights issue where they assigned everyone who applied for extra shares a minimum number then prorated after that. The minimum allocation for extra shares then was 200 shares.

If they use this formula, there are 25,000 shareholders who we can conservatively assume all applied for extra shares.. There are 12.7M untaken shares. If these are split equally among the 25k shareholders, then those who applied for extra shares can expect a minimum of 500 shares. This formula also takes care of the Ndegwa's potential illegality of exceeding the 25% rule.
gesowan
#69 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:00:59 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/6/2010
Posts: 289
Shareholders did not apply for 12.7 million shares they were entitled to under the one-for-four rights issue, meaning those who had sought more shares than they were entitled to, would be allocated additional shares
mwekez@ji
#70 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:25:03 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
238% oversubscription rate! Thats massive! Whats Ndegwas contribution to this? Then we can tell the pro rata rate to be applied in allotment of the few untaken rights
16 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.