Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
jaggernaut wrote:I remember we used to have one them days. Will search for it next time i visit shags. I have seen on the web that it has a very high reputation for its reliability and durability unlike the soot producing and smelly wick stoves of today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primus_stoveQuote:The efficient Primus stove quickly earned a reputation as a reliable and durable stove in everyday use, and it performed especially well under adverse conditions: it was the stove of choice for Fridtjof Nansen's North Pole attempt, Roald Amundsen’s expedition to the South Pole[5] and Richard Byrd’s to the North Pole.[6] Primus stoves also accompanied Mallory on Mt. Everest[7] as well as Tenzing and Hillary there many decades later.[8]
Prior to the introduction of the Primus, kerosene stoves were constructed in the same manner as oil lamps, which use a wick to draw fuel from the tank to the burner and which produce a great deal of soot due to incomplete combustion. The Primus stove’s design, which uses pressure and heat to vapourize the kerosene before ignition, results in a hotter, more efficient stove that does not soot.[12] Because it did not use a wick and did not produce soot, the Primus stove was advertised as the first “sootless” and “wickless” stove.[13] If it was invented after the wick stove and that it was far much efficient then I WONDER why its sales were discontinued and the wick stove flooded the market? Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|