wazua Wed, Apr 1, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

6 Pages<1234>»
TransCentury H1 2012 profit jumps six fold
Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
Kausha
#11 Posted : Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:17:09 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 808
But seriously @VVS matu's shop has an NAV of 1.05Billion and a market cap of 150m. Most of the NAV is in property. Doesn't it make sense for shareholders to gang up and dissolve the company and share spoils and go home rather than keep the company afloat so that the spoilt child - matu can keep playing.
Back to top
  |
VituVingiSana
#12 Posted : Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:24:38 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
Kausha wrote:
But seriously @VVS matu's shop has an NAV of 1.05Billion and a market cap of 150m. Most of the NAV is in property. Doesn't it make sense for shareholders to gang up and dissolve the company and share spoils and go home rather than keep the company afloat so that the spoilt child - matu can keep playing.
1bn? I doubt it is that high. And yes, it is better to close that shop down so matu & his crooked friends can stop stealing.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Back to top
  |
Kausha
#13 Posted : Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:48:44 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 808
@VVS Total Equity at 29th Feb 2012 was 1,067,228, 000.

check for your self boss
http://www.nse.co.ke/lis...capital-holdings-limited.
Back to top
  |
h2s
#14 Posted : Saturday, August 11, 2012 7:19:43 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 7/20/2012
Posts: 141
Why is it even after this announcement, the stock has not made any significant movements?
Back to top
  |
mwekez@ji
#15 Posted : Saturday, August 11, 2012 7:36:52 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
@h2s, the share is still expensive from a Price Earning Ratio perspective. However, the company has got lots of potential.

Wazuans, why is the diluted EPS (KES 0.57) higher than the basic EPS (KES 0.30). #H1 2012 results
Back to top
  |
mwekez@ji
#16 Posted : Saturday, August 11, 2012 7:41:17 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
Why is the profit attributable to Equity holders (KES 82,389,000) lower than what is attributable to non-controlling interest (KES 243,700,000)? #the H1 2012 results
Back to top
  |
dave.kim
#17 Posted : Sunday, August 12, 2012 11:55:07 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 6/25/2010
Posts: 176
mwekez@ji wrote:
Why is the profit attributable to Equity holders (KES 82,389,000) lower than what is attributable to non-controlling interest (KES 243,700,000)? #the H1 2012 results

Clarify the difference please
Rule No.1 is never lose money. Rule No.2 is never forget rule number one
Back to top
  |
VituVingiSana
#18 Posted : Monday, August 13, 2012 9:36:33 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
mwekez@ji wrote:
@h2s, the share is still expensive from a Price Earning Ratio perspective. However, the company has got lots of potential.

Wazuans, why is the diluted EPS (KES 0.57) higher than the basic EPS (KES 0.30). #H1 2012 results
oz of the Convertible Bond
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Back to top
  |
mwekez@ji
#19 Posted : Monday, August 13, 2012 10:00:30 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
VituVingiSana wrote:
mwekez@ji wrote:
@h2s, the share is still expensive from a Price Earning Ratio perspective. However, the company has got lots of potential.

Wazuans, why is the diluted EPS (KES 0.57) higher than the basic EPS (KES 0.30). #H1 2012 results
oz of the Convertible Bond


how? the workings are welcomed
Back to top
  |
mwekez@ji
#20 Posted : Monday, August 13, 2012 10:02:12 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
dave.kim wrote:
mwekez@ji wrote:
Why is the profit attributable to Equity holders (KES 82,389,000) lower than what is attributable to non-controlling interest (KES 243,700,000)? #the H1 2012 results

Clarify the difference please


Out the PAT of KES 326,089,000/- only KES 82,389,000/- is attributable to equity holders of parent company (the controlling interest/transcentury company). The rest KES 243,700,000/- is going to the minority interest (other investors in the firms TCL has a stake in). So, why are equity holders of transcentury getting the smaller cake while the minority interest are getting the bigger cake?
Back to top
  |
6 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Wazua Investor Theme
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.