Cry us a river, brother sirikali.

You have missed the mark despite your brilliance.

School examination results do not have any direct impact on the lives of millions. Individuals' examination results do.

You go to college, pursue a career and live your life as an individual not a school. Perverted minds like you have made it the other way round. That ranking of schools is most important. You are not being vigilant, you are being diversionary, a burden.

Instead of getting the story right, don't you think that it is far much important to get the right story?

The right story that 'vigilant citizens', that you purport to be, ought to be pondering and asking questions about include Kimani WaNjuguna story

For your information, the writer is a stakeholder in education maybe even more than you.

Brief excerpts for your sake:

the number of candidates who scored a mean grade of:
a) E increased from 6,198 in 2010 to 6,600;
b) D-minus — shot up from 41,207 to 47,273,
c) D plus, was 63,853.

d) in 2011, the candidates who scored low grades were more than those who had top marks.

e) This means that most of our learning institutions are churning out failures despite the millions of taxpayers’ shillings that are pumped into the public school system.

If you really have the interest of 'millions of parents, students, teachers etc' at heart you will be concerned about the above figures and its implications. You do not.

Mop all you want.

@srikal sorry to burst your bubble but I can confirm to you that these papers were being hawked long before the exams. Back in my day we never saw leaks but in 2011 there definitely were leaks, so get your head out of the sand

@srikal if you are new here, I would advise you not to try to get sense into drunkard, we all had our chances and gave up, the guy is just plain 'SPECIAL'

@ Sirikali1
Since you brought up the effecient market thing, I am going to shift my argument and expose your shallow knowledge on the topic you intentionally brought up to scare me.

First grammar is not my thing, you can even make it harder if you write in swahili because it is a struggle for me to read swahili not because I am good in English but because I am bad in swahili, so that is clarified.

Now onto the effecient market thing, there is not link between effecient market hypothesis and market correcting itself so do not mix them up, I do not know your level of knowledge on capital markets but please if your knowledge was obtain through the study of principles of finance then lets end the conversation there is alot more linked to market correcting itself than what principles of finance teaches. First if you agree on existance of arbitrage opportunity then you agree on markets correcting itself, if you do not agree on it then drop the arguments. Secondly knowing people like you is of no value at all, fundamental information that you can obtain from knowing people is becoming less and less profitable because of-ineffecient markets-, fundamental analysis has been replaced by technical analysis. Please don't give me bullshit finance, your kidneys are still up for sale

your english is crap too, try gekoyo

doesnt your comp have a spell checker or something?