wazua Sat, Jan 11, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

fourways junction court injunction
Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
vinii
#1 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 8:12:36 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/14/2009
Posts: 2,057
one lucy wanja gatabaki has obtained court order restraining further dealings in fourways property. What is the real story here? I think the developer - suraya - is a fairly credible company
If you are an eagle don't hang around with chickens; chickens don't fly....
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
mkonomtupu
#2 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 9:37:08 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 2/10/2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: River Road
suraya bought matrimonial property thinking only the husband had all the rights to the property well the wife is now staking her claim to the property.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
vinii
#3 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 9:53:56 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/14/2009
Posts: 2,057
mkonomtupu wrote:
suraya bought matrimonial property thinking only the husband had all the rights to the property well the wife is now staking her claim to the property.

waaaaah !!! Very unfortunate for the innocent buyers of individual units -
If you are an eagle don't hang around with chickens; chickens don't fly....
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Lolest!
#4 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 11:03:01 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
Is this Ms Gatabaki related to Njehu, a former Githunguri MP?

One thing I noted is that our residential market is being pushed by speculators. One guy had applied for 8 units!
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
ecstacy
#5 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 11:52:30 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 4,449
Link?
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Elder
#6 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 11:59:11 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/7/2010
Posts: 2,148
Location: elderville
Lolest! wrote:
Is this Ms Gatabaki related to Njehu, a former Githunguri MP?

One thing I noted is that our residential market is being pushed by speculators. One guy had applied for 8 units!

Maybe has a big family, or investing for rental income.

@ecstacy on today's Standard. And the lady has taken out a full page advert publishing the particulars of the interim injunction.
He who can express in words the ardour of his love, has but little love to express. - Petrach, Son. (That men by various ways arrive at the same end. - Montaigne, The Essays of.)
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
FundamentAli
#7 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:05:21 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 1,289
Location: Nairobi
mkonomtupu wrote:
suraya bought matrimonial property thinking only the husband had all the rights to the property well the wife is now staking her claim to the property.


I thought the wife's name is Sue Muraya. Does Pete have two wives?
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
ecstacy
#8 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:06:53 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 4,449
Elder wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Is this Ms Gatabaki related to Njehu, a former Githunguri MP?

One thing I noted is that our residential market is being pushed by speculators. One guy had applied for 8 units!

Maybe has a big family, or investing for rental income.

@ecstacy on today's Standard. And the lady has taken out a full page advert publishing the particulars of the interim injunction.


Thank you. Page 21, The Standard.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Burning Spear
#9 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:31:43 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/22/2008
Posts: 1,139
FundamentAli wrote:
mkonomtupu wrote:
suraya bought matrimonial property thinking only the husband had all the rights to the property well the wife is now staking her claim to the property.


I thought the wife's name is Sue Muraya. Does Pete have two wives?



Sue Wacheke is married to Peter Muraya hence Suraya

also Daily Nation pg 26 and 27
"You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it". Malcolm X
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM | Edit by user: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:34 PM | Reason: Not specified
bwenyenye
#10 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:36:15 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 5/24/2007
Posts: 1,805
This was surprising to me until I remembered that there were similar stories when the project was kicking off. Interestingly, I saw a purchaser listed with similar names to the complainant!
I Think Therefore I Am
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
For Sport
#11 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:54:04 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 12/23/2010
Posts: 1,229
Burning Spear wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
mkonomtupu wrote:
suraya bought matrimonial property thinking only the husband had all the rights to the property well the wife is now staking her claim to the property.


I thought the wife's name is Sue Muraya. Does Pete have two wives?



Sue Wacheke is married to Peter Muraya hence Suraya

also Daily Nation pg 26 and 27


@FundamentAli
The "matrimonial" property in issue is the one Suraya bought for this development
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Gordon Gekko
#12 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 12:56:37 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
Lolest! wrote:
Is this Ms Gatabaki related to Njehu, a former Githunguri MP?

One thing I noted is that our residential market is being pushed by speculators. One guy had applied for 8 units!


I still insist someone will be left holding one very wet monkey.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
mkonomtupu
#13 Posted : Monday, August 15, 2011 1:07:31 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 2/10/2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: River Road
Nancy is Dr. Gatabaki wife, Dr. Gatabaki is Njehu Gatabaki brother, njehu bought the property from the brother which he then sold to suraya for 192m. Njehu's wife(racheal) then took him to court to stop him from disposing the property which she claimed they jointly acquired, now it seems nancy has joined the fray. That's where the mix is, it has nothing to do with pete and sue. I've interacted with them so allow me not to comment further.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
vinii
#14 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:32:53 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/14/2009
Posts: 2,057
Business Daily has shade more light on the saga;

The case so far

Mr and Mrs (Dr) Samwel Gatabaki jointly owned 200 acres through Sagana Developers Ltd under coffee.
1996: Former Githunguri MP Njehu Gatabaki purchases 20 acres from Sagana Developers.
May 2007: Suraya Property Group approaches Sagana Developer with a proposal for a joint venture to build a multi-billion shilling real estate project on the 180 acres of land.
February 2009: Muga Developers is formed, jointly owned by the two families through Suraya and Sagana on 50:50 basis.
March 2009: Muga Developers strike a deal with the former MP involving a buy-back of the 20 cares of land at Sh192 million, but his wife moves to court to have the transfer quashed. Matter is yet to be resolved.
2011: Mrs Gatabaki of Sagana Developers moves to court challenging the present shareholding structure, and decisions made by the other shareholders, including her husband Dr Gatabaki.
11 August 2011: Milimani Commercial Court issues temporary orders restraining four shareholders and five other interested parties from any dealings involving Fourways Junction estate and any bank accounts held by Muga Developers.
500 home buyers who had paid a total of Sh2 billion are caught in the fight.
If you are an eagle don't hang around with chickens; chickens don't fly....
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Kaigangio
#15 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:35:44 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/27/2007
Posts: 2,768
...hope it is not another mbo-i-kamiti saga in the offing....
...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
ecstacy
#16 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:56:22 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 4,449
Matter to be heard on August 25th 2011 and the ruling later issued.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
mukiha
#17 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:00:14 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 4,114
vinii wrote:
Business Daily has shade more light on the saga;........
.



@vinii; was that a mistake or an intentional pun? You see, the phrase is "shed some more light". But when you write "shade some more light", the word shade dances very well with light... opposite meanings highlight the complexity of the transactions...
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Mainat
#18 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:36:25 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/21/2006
Posts: 1,590
Hence why you need clarity over the owner/developer jvs.
Sehemu ndio nyumba
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
eco
#19 Posted : Tuesday, August 16, 2011 7:55:28 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 6/17/2011
Posts: 229
vinii wrote:
Business Daily has shade more light on the saga;

The case so far

Mr and Mrs (Dr) Samwel Gatabaki jointly owned 200 acres through Sagana Developers Ltd under coffee.
1996: Former Githunguri MP Njehu Gatabaki purchases 20 acres from Sagana Developers.
May 2007: Suraya Property Group approaches Sagana Developer with a proposal for a joint venture to build a multi-billion shilling real estate project on the 180 acres of land.
February 2009: Muga Developers is formed, jointly owned by the two families through Suraya and Sagana on 50:50 basis.
March 2009: Muga Developers strike a deal with the former MP involving a buy-back of the 20 cares of land at Sh192 million, but his wife moves to court to have the transfer quashed. Matter is yet to be resolved.
2011: Mrs Gatabaki of Sagana Developers moves to court challenging the present shareholding structure, and decisions made by the other shareholders, including her husband Dr Gatabaki.
11 August 2011: Milimani Commercial Court issues temporary orders restraining four shareholders and five other interested parties from any dealings involving Fourways Junction estate and any bank accounts held by Muga Developers.
500 home buyers who had paid a total of Sh2 billion are caught in the fight.


Sideline and/or ignore your spouse at your own cost. In most of these deals, the men do it single handedly, and the first ladies learn it in the press. Communication, or lack of it thereof = many problems. Would there have been concensus, why would all the first ladies go to Court for injunctions?
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
butterflyke
#20 Posted : Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:38:58 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 3,024
Location: Hapa
anyone with an update on how the case went?
Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. - Muhammad Ali🐝
Back to top
 Report Abusive | Report SPAM
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Wazua Investor Theme
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.