If you look at this two companies one is left to wonder why KCB seems to be lagging behind Equity in-terms of profitability& efficiency.Take for instance the following scenarios:-
Both companies borrowed more than 10B in the last Q equity had a marginal increase of about 2b in its borrowed fund but KCB which had not borrowed b4 had to borrow 10b at a go and I think this money was to boost its liquidity which increased by about 8%.
Staff cost for equity increased by about 1.2b but for KCB it increased by a massive 3B,operating expenses for KCB has been increasing at an alarming rate jumping from 9B to 14.2b within a single Q while equity jumped from 6b to 9b.
I think KCB fails to exploit its full potential it's a follower, it needs to be proactive like equity which tends to be lone ranger in most of its business strategies, hence becomes a leader while KCB always plays catch up.
'......to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ; 3 In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.' Colossians 2:2-3