wazua Fri, Nov 15, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

HIV testing to be made Mandatory
Ms Mkenya
#1 Posted : Monday, September 26, 2011 5:07:23 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 5/13/2010
Posts: 869
Location: Nairobi
In the Daily Nation today

http://www.nation.co.ke/.../-/uv5kqkz/-/index.html

What do you think?
....above all, to stand.
redi
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:31:51 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/24/2008
Posts: 46
Location: Embu
it good it was made public.this knowledge been in the health sector domain for long,bt many were afraid of how the public would react.if a disease affects >1% of the population.Routine/mandatory testing should be done.
Ms Mkenya
#3 Posted : Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:04:24 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 5/13/2010
Posts: 869
Location: Nairobi
What i think they should also make mandatory is testing of significant others like spouses & children. In my view that is so much more important..
....above all, to stand.
YesuWangu
#4 Posted : Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:23:56 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 8/11/2010
Posts: 1,588
Lets be careful we dont unwittingly introduce or promote fascism, though well intentioned especially in such health matters.

As far as I know, the testing was routine but not mandatory.

On second thoughts, a little more, or stronger government can help.
majay
#5 Posted : Thursday, September 29, 2011 1:43:53 PM
Rank: New-farer


Joined: 5/28/2011
Posts: 98
It should be made routine so as to reduce the stigma associated with it

However-it should be made mandatory for all health workers so minimize risks of transmission from a patient-service provider and vice versa
all about Kenya in 2011
metabolist
#6 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 9:01:17 AM
Rank: New-farer


Joined: 3/13/2010
Posts: 32
Location: UK
Screening for any condition only makes sense if you are then going to treat the confirmed cases. This doesn't seem to be the case here, which begs the question why test at all?
Wendz
#7 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 9:12:56 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/19/2008
Posts: 4,268
metabolist wrote:
Screening for any condition only makes sense if you are then going to treat the confirmed cases. This doesn't seem to be the case here, which begs the question why test at all?


I'd think, if the government is going to be well prepared to treat the confirmed cases, it can only do that if it knows what the magnitude is.... planning without testing is like looking for a needle in the dark.

Having said that, we must also accept that there is stigma associated with HIV so it has to be handled very carefully. Or may be people can get tested first on their own so that they know their status first before the mandatory testing is put in place......
Mo
#8 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 10:48:59 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/21/2007
Posts: 326
what does the constitution say about this? is this not an invasion of my private life?
Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story.
Ms Mkenya
#9 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 12:07:07 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 5/13/2010
Posts: 869
Location: Nairobi
@ Wendz, i think we fuel the stigma all the more when the testing is made to be such a big deal..People have had GC which is so clearly sexually transmitted. At least HIV may be transmitted otherwise..
But the govt really needs some stats to work with anyway.

@Majay, Health workers who are at risk (due to needle pricks etc) do the tests anyway. However, this mode of transmission cannot account for more than 1%...

I still think it should be mandatory if the doctor/other health care provider is unable to proceed with treatment without knowing the diagnosis. It is still currently done but it exposes the doctors to litigation.

For children, their health should come first.. Way before the parent's consent. Because the child may just die..
....above all, to stand.
2012
#10 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 12:11:38 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
This is not possible as I believe it contravenes the new constitution on basic human rights (I'll post the section). Even insurance companies can't ask you to do a medical test and your employer is not entitled to your medical results unless you volunteer in writing. Or am I wrong? Any constitution lawyers in the house?

BBI will solve it
:)
Wendz
#11 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 2:02:31 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/19/2008
Posts: 4,268
2012 wrote:
This is not possible as I believe it contravenes the new constitution on basic human rights (I'll post the section). Even insurance companies can't ask you to do a medical test and your employer is not entitled to your medical results unless you volunteer in writing. Or am I wrong? Any constitution lawyers in the house?


Is that so? but what happens those in food sector? Not just HIV, but other diseases too...
bwenyenye
#12 Posted : Monday, October 03, 2011 4:42:48 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 5/24/2007
Posts: 1,805
I don't see what the hullabaloo is all about. It is just a condition like many others irrespective of how one gets it. I do not think anyone goes out there intending to be infected. It just happens on a bad day! Watu wajijue.
I Think Therefore I Am
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.