vote here

HELL NO!

Mathematical derivative 1) Limited depth of thinking state that each player has a bound k on reasoning, where, k=(0,1,....). A player with K=0 is a nonrational and nonstrategic its behavior and answers is used by the other player to out play him/her.

Mathematical derivative 2) There exists a constant k=(0,1) such that for any strictly increasing sequence k: N>N.

Now lets look at the quantitative strategic analysis of Drunkard and why he chose to keep attacking Jason.

To understand it we borrow from the predictions of the models of bounded depth of reasoning in
the gaming and compares various assumptions on beliefs, i.e., various cognitive
type spaces.
For both players, this strategy is simply to attack regardless of the number of messages
received.
player 1, k = 0 A A A ...
(0; 0) (1; 0) (1; 1) (2; 1) (2; 2) ...
player 2, k = 0 A A ....

Now, derive the behavior of types with k = 1. Player 1 in the information set
f(0; 0)g will play N because it is a dominant action when the enemy is strong. In
other information sets, his action will remain A because it is the best response to
player 2 attacking and the enemy being weak.

@drunkard/rollout should remain-he is very brave.

But first an explanation for the 10k

[quote=holycow][quote=Lolest!]@drunkard/rollout should remain-he is very brave.

But first an explanation for the 10k

[/quote]

The Kshs 10,000 pledge that never was.[/quote]
Which derivative do you think Drunkard will use to explain his MIA in the 10k charity thing? I think in this case Mathematical Derivative 1 where he's the player K=0.

And below, was the baited trade which he fell for.

#6 Posted : Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:43:10 PM
[quote=Drunkard]...... when you come up with a way, let me know, I will donate Kshs 10,000, infact I challenge anyone who has ever attack me or correct my very bad writing to donate Kshs 10,000 lets see who has heart and money.[/quote]