Abby wrote:We need {1}consumer protection groups; we are being milked left and right. I have wondered {2}why companies can not shoulder some of the costs.... they just pass them to the consumer.
On the other hand, the standing charge is NOT for meter reading; {3}it is becoz they have used their money to bring service to your House ...whether you consume or not, you pay!!
Pole.
{1} There is COFEK. If you are not happy with the way they are doing things, may be you should form one.
{2} Companies DO shoulder some of the costs. Look at any company's income statement and you will see an item called "COST OF GOODS"! It would be unfair to expect a company to operate at a loss; in fact, it would be unsustainable.
{3} Not true. The cost of bringing the service to your house is paid for when you pay the "connection fees". The standing charge is totally indefensible... and therefore unwarranted!
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.