For Sport wrote:sihingwa wrote:Njung'e wrote:sihingwa wrote:Simply a chicken or egg story? I bought a car wit the very first loan I took. My subsequent loans have been for land. I think the sequence does not matter...
What do you mean?....A car is a liability and not an asset.....land is.....You don't believe?.Put a cart before a donkey and ask it to push!
Depends on whether the car is used to facilitate my business / work (a tool) or used for leisure (expenditure)
Taxi? car hire? or what dyou transport in your car?
As pointed out, land appreciates. Your car depreciates in value. Sequence does matter. A car loan is funny (being polite here) in the sense that you pay based on the value of the car at the time you're taking the loan. By the time you're done paying off that loan, the car has seriously depreciated (irrespective of what use u put it to). Land on the other hand will have appreciated in value at the end of the loan period.
I would rather take out a loan for land, than for a car.
@all
Economic sense dictates that you start with land as it will appreciate. However any can do! In any case depending on how much loan one can take, they can do both at the same time. Its simply as stated by Sihingwa - chicken and egg story allover. This would be different if we assume that the intial loan is the only money you will ever handle in your life and that you life depends on it. In this case forget about the car.
You will know that you have arrived when money and time are not mutually exclusive "events" in you life!